Gay Rights

The Bible is Not About Beating LGBT People Up

Published September 01, 2009 @ 09:18PM PT

Bible

What book happens to be required reading for about 99.9% of the anti-LGBT crowd?  The Bible.  But underneath its surface, what book is actually full of stories about liberation and justice that push a message of love, equality, and acceptance?  The Bible.  At least according to a new collection from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC).

HRC announced the release of a collection of writings, "Out in Scripture," which compiles 175 conversations about the Bible from 100 diverse scholars and pastors, from over 11 different denominations.  That's a whole lot of religion, and a whole lot of effort being put into debunking the myth that religion is incompatible with LGBT issues.

“Over the years my spiritual life and preaching has been transformed by ‘Out In Scripture,’” said Harry Knox, Director of HRC’s Religion and Faith Program.  “This is one of our signature projects.  As editor Sidney Fowler said, ‘The Bible is not about beating you up, but lifting us all up.  It includes the seeds of liberation and justice.’ Be prepared to be transformed as well.”

It's kind of like a week-by-week look at the Bible with a lens on LGBT spirituality.  And it highlights an ongoing trend between religiousity and LGBT rights.  More and more, in fact, clergy are becoming key players in debates over issues like marriage equality.  As HRC says about this collection, there's an extraordinary momentum building to foster religious voices for equality.

"Through this resource we are helping to assure that no one will again have to choose between who they are and what they believe," HRC said.  Here's hoping "Out in Scripture" helps to dispell the myth that the Bible has nothing to say about homosexuality other than condemnation.  Because the picture is much bigger for people willing to, as HRC says, open their hearts and minds a little bit more.

(Photo courtesy of Wonderlane's photostream on Flickr.)

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (145)

  1. Alex Montagna

    Religion should be kept in Churchs, synogauges, temples, holy grounds.

     

    The bible is perhaps the most often quoted book, why do people take it so seriously?

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/02/2009 @ 03:33AM PT

  2. Ray G

    For those who are not religious, this is fine if you don't need it outside churches & synagogues.  I respect that.  But for those of us who are, part of being religious is living out its principles in day-to-day life, wherever we are and through whatever we do.  If we keep it only within the churches we attend, and not living it in our lives, then we're not really religious.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/02/2009 @ 06:00AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  3. Alex Montagna

    Believe it or not, people who aren't Christian are more than annoyed hearing about what Jesus or the Bible says. You're more than welcome to talk about it, but you should remember their are a lot of us who don't care to hear.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/03/2009 @ 05:47AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  4. Ray G

    If you don't care to hear, then why take the time to read an article on religion, and respond with comments?  Seems like you're going out of your way to hear about something you don't want to hear about.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/03/2009 @ 06:07AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  5. david zellers

    Homosexuals are in double standard here.  They want religion kept at the church, but do they keep their sexual beliefs in the bedroom?  If they did we would never hear about it. 

    No, the Bible must be lived out 24/7. And we take it so seriously because YOU (and I) are accountable to Him regardless of your beliefs or feelings.

    Posted by david zellers on 09/03/2009 @ 11:17AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  6. Alex Montagna

    No one is accountable to the boogeyman in the sky from a religion that has shed more blood than anything else.

     

    You and I are accountable to whoever or whatever or nothing. You can't prove anything from the bible, get over it. Your holier than thou, "YOU and I are accountable" nonsense.  If their is a god or a goddess, it certaintly doesn't agree with the Bible, some book that a compilation of old men who have no respect for anyone that isn't the same race, religion and sex? You people haven't read your book too well.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/07/2009 @ 05:34AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  7. Steven Markham

    Repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. you can not see what the saved see. if you have not received the spirit then you have never known it. to say the bible lies is to call Jesus a liar, ouch. he has all power in heaven and on earth. heaven and earth shall pass away but his words are eternal baby. we are living on a dying planet not an evolving one lol

    Posted by Steven Markham on 09/07/2009 @ 10:32PM PT

  8. Alex Montagna

    We all live on Earth. We all have the same fate.

     

     

    Jesus is a lie, he never existed.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/08/2009 @ 05:33AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  9. Alex Montagna

    Do you really think you're going to be ushered away in a rapture, leave it to humanity they'll be ushering you into a rapture of nuclear meltdowns.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/08/2009 @ 05:39AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  10. Thomas McHugh

    To all of you fundemental christians above...

    You can and should live your beliefs BUT please keep in mind that living them doesnt entail forcing them on others or denying equality to minorities.

    By and by...Sexual beliefs have nothing to do with the fact that equality belongs to all of us no matter what our sexual orientation.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 06:39PM PT

  11. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. markham...

    I will not only say that the bible is full of lies and contradictions but will also say that jehovah has shown throughout the old testement that he was and presumably still is an evil god of intollerance and hypocrisy.

    Whether jesus lived or not is besides the point since so many of you who claim to follow him are actually following his evil power mad father.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 06:45PM PT

  12. Reply to thread
  13. Scott Bailey

    Very good article, it is frustrating with the Religion Right use passages from the Bible to support their cause or way of thinking and ignore so many others that could contradict what their message means.  The bible should not be taken so literally, it is a serious of stories. I look at it more historical than I do factual.  I used to be very religious, but now spend my energy on just being a good and honest person.

    Posted by Scott Bailey on 09/02/2009 @ 06:15AM PT

  14. david zellers

    Have you actually looked for yourself and found the contradictions that say homosexuality is wrong and then it says it is right?  You may find an argument where believers should be more loving (tolerant), but you''ll be hard pressed to find where God said homosexuality gets His stamp of approval. (People stray from being consistent, but He always is.)

    You tell of how You believe or feel, but ultimately it matters what God says is true.  I challenge you to find what He says to be a good and honest person.

    Posted by david zellers on 09/03/2009 @ 11:31AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  15. Scott Bailey

    I never said gays had a stamp of approval, but I am quite certain that my god would look more favorable upon someone in a loving relationship vs someone using his words to spread hate and intolerance.  There has been a pattern throughout history of the church of misusing the Bible to justify oppression, using it to condone slavery, segregation and oppose women's rights etc.

    So I don't care what the BIBLE actually says as you can find many things in there to condone a variety of intolerant behavior such as yours. To me Religion is the root of all evil in the World and the people that choose to hide behind the bible or the Qur'an are the biggest cowards in the world.

    Posted by Scott Bailey on 09/09/2009 @ 06:44AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  16. Reply to thread
  17. Ray G

    and to add to my previous post - I'm all for equal rights in gay issues, and attend a gay-friendly church.  But I also support the right of those who have different opinions -- I just hope one day we can sensible, oipen discussions and stop hitting each other with the Bible.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/02/2009 @ 06:21AM PT

  18. Chris Marshall

    Well it all depends Ray. Hatred must be something people are willing to not tolerate at any level. Heterosexism is hatred just like racism is. Granted people have different opinions, we have to question the morality and ethics of such opinions and help other release that hatred they saturate themselves with. Granted hatred will never dissapear we should not tolerate intolerance and work together in protecting others from such things.

    Posted by Chris Marshall on 09/02/2009 @ 06:14PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  19. Reply to thread
  20. Amanda Kloer

    What a great article!  I get so frustrated as a Christian who supports LGBT equality.  Jesus never actually admonishes homosexual acts in the bible, but he admonishes the heck out of heterosexual acts, like husbands and wives cheating on each other.  You would think if same-sex relationships were a big no-no, he would have mentioned it at least once, right?  I mean, he spent a lot of time talking about what to do and not do.  

    All the biblical support for discrimination against LGBT people comes exclusively from other parts of the Bible than Jesus's teachings, most of which are Old Testement verses.  For most Christians, one effect of Christ's death and ressurection was the nullification of the original covenant made with God in the Old Testament, since the new covenant was formed in Christ's sacrifice.  So those admonitions should be void for followers of Christ.

    Furthermore, most of the stories that involve homosexuality, like Sodom and Paul's letter aren't about loving same-sex relationships, they're about rape and adultery, which Jesus says are wrong no matter who you're raping/adulterating with.  So if you're married, don't have sex with someone you're not married to, whether that's a man or a woman.

    For me the best summary of they way mainstream Christianity has used the bible to discriminate against LGBT is in the excellent movie Saved, about teen girls at a Christian school.  Mandy Moore's character is trying to get Jenna Malone's into a car, and to get her attention, Moore throws a bible and hits Malone on the head.  Malone turns around, sighs, and says "You people don't you get it.  This is not a weapon."  She's right.    

    Posted by Amanda Kloer on 09/02/2009 @ 06:36AM PT

  21. You are correct that Christ did condemn all sin, even heterosexual activity sin I (so to speak), and call us all to repentance.  Repentance is the access key through the door of grace.  It is quite beautiful.

    Posted by James Dunham on 09/02/2009 @ 11:29AM PT

  22. Alex Montagna

    OMG if their is a creator, don't you think he gave us a a way to procreate for a reason?

     

    Why are people so assinine to believe that something is wrong with sex, it's the most beautiful thing we have. Stop believing this crazyness.

     

    You don't need to repent for something our creator would expect(not the fairytale Yahweh), sex is the most natural thing we have..

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/07/2009 @ 05:37AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  23. Rev. Judy Tergis

    I agree completely with you Amanda.  As a Christian minister I am sad to see people use Christianity to defend their own fear of change.  Jesus was killed by that same fear.

    Some use Christianity like a "brand" that seems to legitimize any theology that comes along, even the latest version of "affluence theology" that always teaches that their god made them rich because he loved them more than the poor.

    Thanks again for your great post.

     

    Posted by Rev. Judy Tergis on 09/07/2009 @ 11:14PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  24. Jon Bankes

    Jesus' death was pre-ordained, just like his birth. 

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/11/2009 @ 05:30PM PT

  25. James Miller

    But that doesn't sanctify the behavior of those who killed him or somehow justify the hatred.

    Posted by James Miller on 09/12/2009 @ 04:32PM PT

  26. Thomas McHugh

    Indeed and well said miss kloer.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 06:51PM PT

  27. J B

     

    Amanda- 

    Just because the "old law has passed and the new law has come" doesnt mean the OT is irrelevant, and you mention that most scripture addressing homosexuality is either in the Old Testament or not out of Jesus' mouth- neither of which challenge the credibility or centrality of the verse.  If you are a follower of Christ and believe in the Bible, you would also believe "ALL scripture is god-breathed and useful for teaching."  All scripture, not just the NT and not just the words in red.

    Secondly, you mention Jesus' silence on the homosexuality as evidence for his approval.  By your own standard, then, Jesus would be all for slavery, known today as human trafficking, for which we all know you are a strong advocate against.  Slavery was insituted by the patriarchs of the Old Testament, the judges, the prophets, and the Apostal Paul defended slavery as an institution, and Jesus himself was silent on the issue.  By your own logic then, Jesus is for slavery- which we both know isn't reality.  He cares deeply that the dignity of each of his children is upheld, he hates the abuse trafficking victims face.

    I say all this just so you know that the fact that scripture addressing homosexuality primarily in the OT and Jesus' silence on the issue is far from a Biblical justification for homosexuality.   I appreciate your thoughtful input.

     

    Posted by J B on 09/18/2009 @ 11:33PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  28. Reply to thread
  29. Cherokee Fred Jesus

    Separation is not being practiced today. We must insist on having religion keep in churches. Today the churches are using their money and power to influence everything. If it were not for the ACLU there would be a law putting you in jail if you did not attend a christian church every Sunday....

     

    Posted by Cherokee Fred Jesus on 09/02/2009 @ 08:38AM PT

  30. Jon Bankes

    You completely misinterpret the constitution in saying that we need to keep religion a Church (building).  The government is forbidden by the constitution from making any such law.

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/11/2009 @ 05:33PM PT

  31. Thomas McHugh

    And the church is forbidden to run the goverment mr. bankes.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 06:56PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  32. Jon Bankes

    True, but it's the other that appears to be in danger of happening.

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/20/2009 @ 09:45PM PT

  33. Thomas McHugh

    Wrong mr. bankes.

    Its the fundemental christian churches that have been determined and still are determined to legislate their "morality" into secular law by misinterpreting and/or ignoring the 1st amendment.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/12/2009 @ 10:09PM PT

  34. Jon Bankes

    What about moral laws against things like stealing, or murder?  Shall we get rid of these?  They take their basis from church teachings, too.

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 10/13/2009 @ 05:12AM PT

  35. Rev. Judy Tergis

    Laws against stealing and murder do not come from church teachings, they come from every culture that has existed.  In fact, "native" cultures not only had laws against murder, they actually didn't murder, unlike the Bible based cultures, Judaism, Christianity and Islam that murder others with impunity saying their Bible told them to.

     

    Posted by Rev. Judy Tergis on 10/13/2009 @ 09:30AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  36. Jon Bankes

    You need to dig a little deeper if you think Native American's social structure wasn't based on faith in a creator.

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 10/14/2009 @ 05:22AM PT

  37. Thomas McHugh

    Well said reverend tergis.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/14/2009 @ 02:48PM PT

  38. Rev. Judy Tergis

    Let's separate spirituality from religion.  Native cultures around the world were very spiritual in that they knew spirit resides in everything; the earth, the sky, the water, the plants, and every living creature.  It was the religious people who murdered, tortured, and enslaved those truly spiritual people.

    On Columbus Day we celebrate the beginning of the end of the native peoples of the Americas and look at what we have now.  Pollution, poverty, endless war and hatred of our fellow human beings.  

    I am sorry that so many have replaced true spirituality with a book that is a manifesto for authoritarian domination.

    Jesus was one of the saints who tried to teach us that God is love and, like most of the saints, he was murdered.  And today people believe god tells them who to hate.  If Jesus came back today how long would he last?

     

    Posted by Rev. Judy Tergis on 10/14/2009 @ 08:13PM PT

  39. Reply to thread
  40. Ray G

    Not true -- we do have something in US Constitution calling for freedom of religion, and prohibiting the government from supporting any religion.  We also have something calling for freedom of speech, which protects the right of church-goers to voice their concerns wherever they want.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/02/2009 @ 08:57AM PT

  41. Chris Marshall

    Ray it clearly states that freedom of religion also means freedom from religion. Also granted we have the freedom of speech, that freedom has its limit when it calls for the senseless destruction of others.

    Posted by Chris Marshall on 09/02/2009 @ 06:16PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 6 people like this comment.   Like
  42. William Brown

    Ray,

    You're right that we have that protection in the constitution. However, the constitution has often been enforced in a discrimminatory manner. Unfortunately, our history as a nation is full of selective enforcement of these rights.

    The constitution isn't the problem here, it's the fact that it is not being followed. Separation of church and state is being called for by the constitution, but the reality is, it is imperfectly enforced.

    Posted by William Brown on 09/03/2009 @ 12:07PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 5 people like this comment.   Like
  43. Michael Langley

    The Constitution establishes that no religion can be forced on anyone.  The idea of separation of church and state was penned by Thomas Jefferson and is not in the Constitution.  In fact, there are other quotes about how the US can not maintain good moral character without moral men guided by their religious beliefs. You want to be atheist (and atheists have morals, too), it is your right.  But it is also the right of a religious person to also practice their religion, free from anyone's persecution.  I thought that was why the Pilgrims came to America, in the first place!

    And, I do not hate gays!  I have friends who are gay and my daughter is bisexual! I feel the term, "homophobia", is created by people who do not like the fact that our Bible denounces "laying with another man" (or woman).  But, then again, any "religious" person who has sex out of marriage, is also an abomination to God, according to the teachings in our Bible.  That is where I like to think of it as "judge not lest you be judged"  Don't think because you are not a homosexual that it makes you any better than that person. You are no better than anyone else! Too bad, too many people in this country have the "uppity" attitude!

     

    Then the quote I like best is the only commandment Jesus gave to us Christians "Love your neighbor as yourself"  How can you do anything bad to people (including homosexuals, or anyone else you want to put into a group to persecute) if you love them like you do yourself?!  That takes in all of the old testament commandments and then some!

    Did you know the Bible feels gossip is as bad a sin as murder?  It is in there, I have read it!

     

    I try not to talk to people, about my religious beliefs, that don't want to hear about it.  I don't feel that it is polite.  I don't want to force my beliefs on anyone, period!  Then again, there is something about "casting pearls before swine"

    Posted by Michael Langley on 09/07/2009 @ 06:19PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  44. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. langly...

    Practicing your religion does not equate to forcing it on others nor does it give you the right to legislate your ide of morality into law.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 07:00PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  45. Jon Bankes

    Is forcing Christian morals out any different?  The law is what it is - our founders based it on biblical values.  Will you now undo the framework of our nation simply to replace it with your own moralities?

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/20/2009 @ 09:50PM PT

  46. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. bankes...

    Neither the united states nor the legal system was ever based on christianity or for that matter any other religion.

    Our system of laws was originaly based on the roman system.

    As for forcing christianity out...It never should have been allowed in our secular goverment in the first place.

    And I would not want the framework of any nation let alone ours to be based on any religion...Period.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/12/2009 @ 10:20PM PT

  47. Jon Bankes

    If you want to know what the founders believed, read what they wrote (instead of what others wrote ABOUT them).  The opening line of the Declaration of Independence, for starters. 

    If you would choose to create a government totally free of any and all religion, what then would you base it on?  Without basing laws on SOME faith, what do you have left?  If you won't base your law on a higher power, there can be no  moral law.  That means everything is subjective and personal.  If everything is subjective and personal, anything is allowable.  Anything.  The entire concept of wrong doesn't exist without there being a right.  As such, nothing is punishable.  People would be free to beat, rob, rape, and anything else you can imagine with no consequence to themselves.  In such a world there can be no rights, constitutional or otherwise. 

    A nation without religion is a nation of evolution, with man as top dog in the universe.  The only laws in that world is survival of the fittest and rule by the most powerful.  I don't know if the city gangs or the rednecks from the Deliverance movie would win the war, but I wouldn't want to live under either regime, personally. ;-)

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 10/13/2009 @ 05:37AM PT

  48. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. bankes...

    I actually have a copy of both the united states constitution and the declaration of independance.

    Neither endorses any one god or goddess and in fact is worded to allow for everyones spiritual beliefs to exist. 

    And for the record sir...I was moral long before I was religious.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/14/2009 @ 02:40PM PT

  49. Reply to thread
  50. Lee Dorsey

    Oh my MJ... thanks for the share, I think. Sent out to friends with views way way out on both sides. We will see what hits the fan.

    Posted by Lee Dorsey on 09/02/2009 @ 09:22AM PT

  51. Suzanne Marienau

    The Bible is the Word of God. Whether you believe in Him or not, He made the world and all in it. Period. The Bible is not anti-people, or anti-gay people. It is anti-sin. So many get this wrong. God loves us all and His son Jesus Christ died for everyone and took their sins upon Himself. If we believe, we are forgiven. What the Bible says about homosexual behavior is that it is a sin and an abomination against God. It says not to do the sin. It doesn't say anything about hating the sinner. We all sin. The key here is repentance. We are to ask for forgiveness and then not do what we asked for forgiveness for anymore. If God hated sinners, do you think He's have placed His son on a cross because of us? I doubt it. To God, sin is sin. He doesn't hate one sin more than another. He hates it all. When God says don't do something, we shouldn't do it. The trouble with people is that we don't want to be denied anything. We put our wants and needs ahead of what God wants for us. The truths in the Bible can be very disturbing for those who don't want to listen and obey, so they don't. God gives us all the freedom to make choices in our lives and for some that means disobedience to Him or not acknowledging Him at all. So be it. But on the last day, He has promised that all will know Jesus Christ - that all will see Him and that all will believe. It is such a tragedy that for so many, this will be their first and only encounter with Him and that they will be cast away from Him forever. All for a few Earthly pleasures.

    Posted by Suzanne Marienau on 09/02/2009 @ 10:15AM PT

  52. Michele Rodriguez

    I don't acknowledge religions because they should be a sin as so many other sins have been sinned because of them.  I am; however, a very strong believer in almost all lessons of the bible and other religious texts.

    Ironic that according to your beliefs it won't be the humans filled with the most genuine goodness and kindness at heart that are accepted by God.  How can I logically accept that instead God will choose only those that accept him and repent for their sins?  Nope.  It doesn't make sense.  Be good for the sake of goodness, care for the sake of caring.  A loving relationship between two people is a good thing regardless of gender.  That's all I need to know.

    Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 09/02/2009 @ 01:30PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 6 people like this comment.   Like
  53. Lovely Michele,

    He will accept "the humans filled with the most genuine goodness and kindness at heart."  How does one become filled with the most genuine goodness and kindness of heart according to Christ?

    Posted by James Dunham on 09/02/2009 @ 02:37PM PT

  54. Michele Rodriguez

    I don't know how according to Christ because I'm not religious but I would take a guess that by accepting him into your heart.  I think I've heard that before.

    To me, one is filled with goodness and kindness of heart by being good and kind to others, to themselves and to the world.  One can be kind and good without religion.

    Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 09/02/2009 @ 03:44PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  55. Thanks Michele.  I don't consider myself religious per se.  I was just asking because you said that you were a believer in almost all the lessons of the Bible. 

    Interestingly, when Christ was referred to as "good Teacher", he asked "Why do you call me good? Only God is good...."  Yet Christ said "..before Abraham was, I am," and said He was without sin.

    So what is "goodness" as that concept is referenced by Christ?

    I love questions.  We always offer each other conclusions; but I think we need to agree on the questions first.

    "Inquiring minds want to know." LOL

    Posted by James Dunham on 09/02/2009 @ 04:54PM PT

  56. Alejandro Segura

    I agree with your post. we will always try to justify our actions and behaviour with our imperfect concept of goodness. God's word is very clear, he doesn't want goodness or kindness, He requires perfection; a sinless life. because that's impossible for human nature to comply with, Jesus comes to the picture. The payment for sin is death, physically and spiritually. He paid that price for all of us.

    Posted by Alejandro Segura on 09/02/2009 @ 05:26PM PT

  57. Michele Rodriguez

    It's an interesting topic James.  Most of the lessons I learned from the bible I learned from being in the musical GodSpell as a teen :)

    God requiring perfection is nuts. Why create human beings knowing perfection is impossible? Part of our beauty as human beings arises from our imperfections.  I do know the story of Adam & Eve and how that's where original sin was brought about but that sounds like such a fairy tale it's right up there with the woman who lived in the shoe.

    Sorry, the whole God thing is really lost on me.  When you're not raised with it, it sounds very strange and foreign.  Other religions do also, not just Christianity.  I can respect the views and beliefs of others even though I don't understand them.  I cannot accept beliefs of others if their hateful beliefs infringe on the rights and result in the mistreatment of others.

    Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 09/02/2009 @ 05:55PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  58. I've always loved musicals ever since I saw a rerun of the original "Music Man" as a kid.  Saw Lion KIng on Broadway a few months ago.  Did Summer theater but I was a musician rather than actor/singer.

    I am a former agnostic then an atheist before coming to faith in God.  Does the Scripture say the Father requires perfection from us to have a relationship with Him?  A good question.  How does repentance, love, forgiveness, grace relate to that?

    As an Attorney and someone who is very evidence-based in my thinking, I appreciated it when the Apostle Paul referred to "the foolishness of the Gospel."  The honesty was surprising and refreshing to me.

    I also found the words of Christ to be quite surprising and different from what I anticipated when I finally read them. 

    I agree with what you said,  I was not raised in a Christian or religious home.  I thought these folks were crazy.

    It IS hard to explain from an intellectaul standpoint in anything but dogmatic terms.  I think of it as something that has to be experienced to be understood; like a kiss or falling in love.

    So I have to confess that I do love Him and, as hard as it is to explain, it is a personal love relationship that has a unique intimacy of heart and soul.  That is why I said I do not consider myself "religious," but I do trust Him and love Him.  I also trust that He is forgiving of all of my faults and failings.

    An analysis of the identity and function of the Holy Spirit in Scripture is also one of the most fascinating studies I have ever done.

    In any event, I am as surprised as anyone that I trust Him today, but He has captivated my heart.  I pray that He helps me to represent Him well and to forgive me when I inevitably fail to express the love, power, holiness and wisdom that is this wonderful Father Whom I have come to appreciate so much.

    As the song goes, "To know Him is to love Him."

    God bless my friend.

    Posted by James Dunham on 09/02/2009 @ 07:17PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  59. Michele Rodriguez

    Is it a particular God though James?  Why not another religion's deity?  Are you talking about spirituality or belief in the Christian faith?  I feel guilty for highjacking this thread with off topic information but religion is always an interesting topic.

    Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 09/02/2009 @ 09:26PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  60. Point well-taken so I will end with this.

    My personal experience and journey has been with Christ.

    But I believe true spirituality is an experiential relationship with God rather than a dogmatic adherence to principles without that relationship.  The fact that this relationship was possible was what was so shocking to me because it was contrary to my upbringing and mindset.  So I can easily recall my thoughts and feelings thinking this was at best confusing nonsense.

    The next logical step, which was harder, was being challenged by His words after I concluded that He was in fact raised from the dead.  I am an independent thinker and I wasn't going to just surrender my mind and all my questions.

    His words are very challenging and really demand a certain surrender.  But the surrender was sweet. So it was very much an intellectual as well as spiritual and emotional journey, but I have known true joy of a unique kind as a result. 

    There were also some very surprising and powerful experiences, but that is a story for another day.

    God does love us, though. 

    But does He challenge us? If so, are we willing to be challenged?

    Perhaps another thread for another day. :o)

    Keep smiling my friend! :o)

    Posted by James Dunham on 09/02/2009 @ 10:03PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  61. Carol Alleman

    I respectfully and totally disagree with your opinion.

    Posted by Carol Alleman on 09/03/2009 @ 08:06PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  62. Alex Montagna

    Blah blah blah.

     

    I'm right I have no proof but he is the creator, why wouldn't you believe something written by medieval mindsetted men???

     

    The word of god huh, why didn't god write it than? Why would men write it, and than why would you trust a book that has created the  Catholic Church of ages past where they murdered and killed people by the cartload? That was in charge during the dark ages?

     

    Thank god the real light of a real creator shown through and showed us being scared of demons and not taking showers and killing cats because they belong to pagans... Not the best way to go about things.

     

    It's always with some Christians, I'm right.. but really you're just a human with no clue.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/07/2009 @ 05:41AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  63. Jon Bankes

    I'm a little lost as to your complaint... True as it is that the catholic church was responsible for horrors, those acts were not supported by the Bible.

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/08/2009 @ 05:20AM PT

  64. Alex Montagna

    The bible is supposed to have been their holy book, and with all the hate and murder they spread. It's hard to trust a book that was in their hands.

     

    People throughout history, quote the bible for whatever crazy assinine plan they can come up with. From Hitler, Bush, to all the fundamentalists that blow up abortion clinics, to crazies on the street.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/08/2009 @ 05:36AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  65. Scott Bailey

    Alex, "People throughout history, quote the bible for whatever crazy assinine plan they can come up with. From Hitler, Bush, to all the fundamentalists that blow up abortion clinics, to crazies on the street."

    Such a great post, it is so true that throughout history the bible has been used for so many atrocities all in the name of God. I lost all faith in God and the church because of all the whack jobs that perpetuate hate in his name.

    Posted by Scott Bailey on 09/09/2009 @ 06:56AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  66. Reply to thread
  67. Edwin Bonilla

    The Human Rights Campaign is doing the correct thing by creating "Out in Scripture" to debunk that the Bible is anti-LGBT. From Henry Knox, a religious man, has said it accurately that the Bible is to advance one's self and not oppression against LGBT people. It's good that more Clergy are supporting the very important right of same-sex marriage. Intolerant conservatives are against LGBT rights because they twist the messages of the Bible for their judgment.

    Posted by Edwin Bonilla on 09/02/2009 @ 01:34PM PT

  68. Alejandro Segura

    Edwin, I'm notfamiliar to Henry Knox's writings. would you be so kind in to point me to some of his material? Or what is your base/experience of twisted doctrine? care to share?

    Posted by Alejandro Segura on 09/02/2009 @ 05:29PM PT

  69. Reply to thread
  70. S B

    Homosexuality is not sin.

    Posted by S B on 09/02/2009 @ 06:14PM PT

  71. Chris Marshall

    According to people who actually understand hewbrew text (the bible, Qu'ran, Torah), history, ideology, and psychology, yes you are correct; homosexuality is not a sin because in the context of the time the bible really never says anything about homosexuality as we know it today. It actually refers to idolatry which can be applied to both gay people and straight people who go against their natural sexual orientation. (gay = gay, straight = straight, bi = both). For those people who do not understand anything but a literal interpretation of the bible and just read the bible verbatim... well you are still correct but they are... misinformed.

    Posted by Chris Marshall on 09/02/2009 @ 06:24PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  72. Alex Montagna

    Sin is a lie. And a way to scare the population in coming to Church and filling their coffers.. Just look at the power the Church had in the past, more power than some Kings.

     

    It's sad this delusional trick has survived so long in human history.

    Posted by Alex Montagna on 09/07/2009 @ 05:45AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 4 people like this comment.   Like
  73. Reply to thread
  74. Rev Bookburn

    It seems pointless most of the time to debate the content of the Bible. Bigots and theocrats can easily twist a mythology book into a rationale for hate. That's why I believe Bibles merit a warning label.

    Debating the Bible also seems to validate the hustlers who become rich by being professional holy spokesmodels. Then they get to say that they are the real authority of the holy book and that the book itself is the supreme ruler (the same reasoning that Islamic fundamentalists use).

    The principles of democracy and diversity stand for keeping chosen holy books in your drawer next to your pleasure toys and other items that are personal instead of public. The Bible does not condemn LGBT people or abortion. But I personally wouldn't be influenced if it did. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta

    Posted by Rev Bookburn on 09/02/2009 @ 06:44PM PT

  75. Courtney C............

    Let's not act like ONLY Christians are anti-LGBT. There are plenty of other religions that aren't so welcoming to LGBT people.

    Posted by Courtney C............ on 09/02/2009 @ 08:11PM PT

  76. Thomas McHugh

    Miss C...

    I know that the 3 abrahamic faiths dont accept homosexuality, at least, not the fundemental sects of those religions but what other religions do you speak of ?

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 07:13PM PT

  77. Reply to thread
  78. jeffrey C oldman

    its sad they are still killing trees printing bibles.  hopefully they switch to hemp bibles until the church actually does go way of the dinosaur.  bankruptcy for both the mormon & catholic church would be inevitable if they continue to fund the opposition if this somehow ends up being 50 states left to decide who can marry.

    the catholic church should immediately return all of the gold they stole from south america.  and then they should just fold up shop.  a failed attempt @ figuring how & why the world works.   there are MUCH better books out their my friend.

    Posted by jeffrey C oldman on 09/03/2009 @ 02:17AM PT

  79. Scott Bailey

    I despise how much money the church has wasted fighting gay marriage, when that money could have been used to feed the poor or other humanitarian causes. Seems so pointless to use money to stop 2 people from being in a loving relationship.

    Gay marriage will happen one day no matter what they do or how much money they spend, we are on the right side of history, so all the money they spend now will be a complete waste.  The Catholic church has had to close some churches in New England yet they are funding with millions of dollars anti gay marriage groups, when they can't even keep their doors open.  I agree let them all go bankrupt, the world would be be a better place when people worry about being good and honest rather than hiding behind a bible and believing someone is going to forgive their sins.

    Posted by Scott Bailey on 09/09/2009 @ 07:04AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 3 people like this comment.   Like
  80. Reply to thread
  81. Ray G

    I am a gay man and belong to a wonderfully welcoming and accepting Methodist church.  We do much to make our neighborhood and city (Wash DC) a better place to live for everyone.  While other churches may have their issues, you can't say this about all churches.  There is still much good that we contribute.  Skeptics out there need to see that there are differences, that we're not all the same.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/03/2009 @ 04:40AM PT

  82. Carol Alleman

    Ray, I'm happy you found a congregation that makes you feel welcome. 

    I am not a Christian. I wish more Christians could find it in their hearts to respect my choice, but I constantly encounter people who NEEEEEED to MAKE me believe it all their way. It's offensive.

    To quote you, "we're not all the same."

    Posted by Carol Alleman on 09/03/2009 @ 08:11PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 4 people like this comment.   Like
  83. Reply to thread
  84. Laurie Walker

    Oh, hey, gays can now just feel so much better about it all!! :)

    Whatever.

    Tell me why any gay person in their right mind, with the slightest autonomous thought still spinning in their heads, and with any real knowledge of the history of the christian church, would even want anything to do with it???

    Anyone smell the hypocricy??  Christians haven't wanted gays in their ranks for these thousands of years because their "good book" says the actions of homosexuals are, quote "an abomination", unquote.   An ABOMINATION.  ok, Ummm, yeah... Call me Lil ms. Negativity, but just how much more UNaccepting a statement can be made by this, THE ANCIENT RULE BOOK of this religion???  

    At what point of watered down does this religion cease to be Christianity????

      But once again, the church bends with the times to suit their needs (i.e. warm bodies with cash in the pews).  Attendance across the nation in the pews of your more liberal Christian denominations is down. 

    Meanwhile folks piling into fundamentalist churches are seeing a real rally....and they do NOT accept gays.

    Some of us won't buy in no matter how they claim to "accept us", whether that means gays or any other stubborn independent thinkers...I don't accept THEM.   

    If you want to know what kind of person someone is, look at their actions, not where they go on Sunday.  What do they do to cause harm?  What do they do to help?  Beyond that, it's NO ONE's "business" what I believe but my own.  THAT is freedom of religion and freedom from religion.

    And I just felt something...  oh,  oh... yep, there it was!  Christian fundamentalists JUST shifted even more toward the extreme... Ever imagine what extremist factions for Christ may do?  It should worry anyone who can see what's happening here... 

    By all means, educate yourself with an open mind. But educate, not postulate.  It's embarrassingly obvious, and it's also further alienating various factions of the Christian Church from one another. 

    Ask the Sunnis and the Shiites how that kind of alienation works out for them.

    Posted by Laurie Walker on 09/03/2009 @ 09:14AM PT

  85. Maria Fisceo

    Good post, I find it very annoying when people take the bible so literally. They just use it as an excuse to gay bash and support their prejudice.

    Posted by Maria Fisceo on 09/03/2009 @ 10:45AM PT

  86. Jon Bankes

    If you understood the teachings of the Bible, you would WANT more 'Christians' to take it literally!  Those who do know that they are called to love you (and everyone else), regardless of what you may be doing that doesn't line up with the teachings in the Bible.

    Those who act out in hatred are as lost to God as they perceive everyone else to be.

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/08/2009 @ 05:28AM PT

  87. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. bankes...

    The ones who are full of hate and the ones who take the bible literaly ARE one and the same.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 07:33PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  88. Jon Bankes

    Wow, I'm full of hate... good to know!

    I do have a heavy sarcastic streak, though. ;-)

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/20/2009 @ 09:56PM PT

  89. Reply to thread
  90. William Brown

    I may use up any good will that I have built up on this site with my following comments, but here goes.

    I am a religious social conservative who does believe in the Bible. The Bible does condemn homosexuality and I accept that as well. HOWEVER, the Bible condemns as sin many other behaviors as well. I am personally guilty of a number of things that the Bible condemns as well. The Bible does not portray homosexuality as some how being worse than many other behaviors.

    When I read 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 I see a list if things of which I am guilty of in my life. I am no one to be policing other people in this regard.

    9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous [1] will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, [2] 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

    This same passage is equally condemnatory to me as well and I understand fully that I am not somehow superior to anyone else. This passage does not give me the right to sit in judgement of others or try and take away their civil rights.

    Too often people spend too much time worying about the imperfections of others rather than their own.  Jesus own words are clear on this in Matthew 7:1-5:

    1(A) "Judge not, that you be not judged. 2(B) For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and(C) with the measure you use it will be measured to you. 3Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but(D) do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when there is the log in your own eye? 5You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.

    Finally, I have never found anything in the teachings of Jesus or of the Apostles that encourages the Church to get involved in pushing its teachings upon the greater community via the authority of the CIVIL government. (That isn't to say they weren't to preach and teach in the public).

    In my view, a Church does not have the God given authority to police the community at large. I believe it has the right and responsibility to do so within itself. I don't believe that I am defending my faith or defending religious marriage by trying to enforce my beliefs through the power of the state.

    I haven't changed the core of my religious beliefs at all in the last 25 years. However, I recognize that laws like DOMA and DADT have nothing to do with actually preserving my beliefs. I will still have them when they are repealed.

    I am really tired of seing the Bible and peoples religious beliefs being twisted so that false religious and political leaders can gain power wealth and influence in this regard.

    I urge religious social conservatives like myself to really question the motives of those who would claim to be representing you and your beliefs in the political arena.

     

    Posted by William Brown on 09/03/2009 @ 11:56AM PT

  91. Michele Rodriguez

    So when he says that people who have done any of those things will be unable to enter the kingdom of God he was being untruthful and meant to say that those people wouldn't enter the kingdom of God unless...

    Very confusing and disturbing.  How can loving someone of the same sex be equated to adultery or greed

    Posted by Michele Rodriguez on 09/07/2009 @ 05:37PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  92. Michael Langley

    Yes, Michelle, I agree it is confusing!  But, according to the readings its says the debt of our sin was paid buy Jesus' sacrifice on the cross. Anyone who wants to add anything to it (religious rules like -- no alcohol, no musical instruments in church, no short hair on women, etc., etc., etc.) says that was not good enough.  It is a free gift... Salvation. Paid for, in full! I can't earn it by "being good"! Too many pompous religious people try to make it a lot harder!  But, it takes faith to believe it.  And, everyone is granted free will to take it or leave it.  All of us Christians are hypocrites, but for the sacrifice of Jesus life, I can look at it differently! I am forgiven. And I should show everyone else love and compassion and mercy, and try to live a Godly life, (even though I know I always fail).  That is what I call "living for Christ"!  Yes, I agree, it is confusing, even to me!

    Posted by Michael Langley on 09/07/2009 @ 06:37PM PT

  93. Rev. Judy Tergis

    Thank you, William, for mentioning the "judge not, that you not be judged" passage from Matthew.  I respect your thoughtful writing.

    It is a shame that some people have used Christianity to gain political and financial power.  Unfortunately people are gullible and easily manipulated by fear and self-righteous rage.  As they say, "you can always raise a lynch mob".

     

    Posted by Rev. Judy Tergis on 09/07/2009 @ 11:31PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  94. Thomas McHugh

    @ Mr. brown.

    I would dare say sir that you have actually gained favor rather than lost it...

    @ Reverend tergis.

    I concur.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 07:39PM PT

  95. Reply to thread
  96. Njoroge  Kabugu

    The Bible is the true word of God whether one believes in it or not. The truth does not change. The Bible is also clear about sin. Sin is sin. Homosexuality is a sin like any other sin, however the Bible also talks about repentance and forgiving of the sins. It talks about loving the sinner and hating the sin.

    There is no person who is not a sinner and that is the reason the Jesus Christ died on the cross to forgive our sins. However when we recognise the sin we are to repent and turn away from it. You cannot continue to sin and then say that the bible is a lie.

    The bible has always been truthful and since we as human beings have sinned from the time we were created, we have always wanted things our way.

    Christianity is only way. Through Jesus Christ and no other way. So if yo are gay, lesbian or whatever sinner you are ask God for forgiveness, repent and start all over again. If you are gay and Christians do not love you then there is a problem with that individual and not the Christan church. Christianity is about Love.

    Posted by Njoroge Kabugu on 09/03/2009 @ 01:40PM PT

  97. Matt Wisniewski

    Christianity is the only way?  I suspect most god-fearing Buddhists ... and Muslims ... Daoists ... Hindus ... would take issue with you.  Come on people, open up your minds and your hearts.  It's not about being 'right', it's about being human.

    Posted by Matt Wisniewski on 09/07/2009 @ 05:11PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  98. Thomas McHugh

    Christianity may be your way sir...

    But it aint my way nor will it ever be.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/15/2009 @ 07:42PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  99. Reply to thread
  100. Ray G

    Correct, in that the truth does not change.  But I believe our human understanding of what the Bible means is always changing, and it has to.  We have a relatively limited scope of understanding, bounded by the knowledge we have and the prejudices we bring to interpreting the world around us.  As we become more educated, as we age, as we meet new people and face new challenges, as we (hopefully) overcome our short-comings, we have to re-learn what the Bible tells us.

    Yes, I am gay, and yes I am a sinner, but I am not a sinner because I am gay.  Yes, Christianity is about love.  It is about loving people where they are, and what they are, not about condemning people because they are outside our limited frame of understanding.

    Too many people here (perhaps myself included) are just spitting out what they believe, trying to quote the Bible to back themselves up, but are not truly listening and trying to understand what other people are saying; and questioning ourselves, and if what we believe is actually valid.  The original article on which this all is based is about trying to interpret what the Bible is actually trying to say on this subject.  We have to sometimes admit that we are wrong, that others' intepretations may have validity.  Otherwise we might as well lock ourselves in the closet and stop trying to communicate altogether.

    I'm going to sign off this page, as I'm tired of reading from people who blindly refuse to believe anything other than what they've clung onto for years, for fear of learning that the Bible may have something new to teach them.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/03/2009 @ 02:20PM PT

  101. Fester 60613

    "‘The Bible is not about beating you up, but lifting us all up."

    How the hell am I supposed to believe that? Forty years of "religious experience" convinces me - and how many millions of others - that the exact opposite is true! The bible is, in fact if not in theory, a WEAPON wielded by the followers of one of the single most vicious and hateful gods ever imagined by the human mind. Sorry - it's far too late for rehabilitation of this Munchausen by proxy syndrome ass hat god.

    I am hated by the church - and I return that hate in kind at every possible opportunity.

    Posted by Fester 60613 on 09/04/2009 @ 07:55AM PT

  102. Ray G

    While you may feel that you are hated by many churches, and by many people in the church, please know that you are not hated by all churches, and not by all people in churches.  We're not all alike.  I and the Christian church I attend openly welcome and respect all gay people as they are, unconditionally.

    Posted by Ray G on 09/04/2009 @ 08:15AM PT

  103. joan gaiptman

    I am Jewish and as far as I know Jesus was born and died a Jew, yet, the Rabbi's don't hold a ground and demand that all follow their perticular views.  There is or suppose to be a seperation of Church and State and for a reason.  If people find love, comfort and caring with a member of their own sex vs. the opposit sex, then bravo for them. The bible is one of the most quoted text, however we must always remember the bible was written by man!!!!!!

    Posted by joan gaiptman on 09/04/2009 @ 08:22AM PT

  104. Alan Ditmore

    We can't look under the surface.  To debate the fundamentalists, we need bible quotes that are clearly and specifically pro gay rights.  The anti-gay quotes are mostly from Ezekial, so we also need a way for the pro-gay quotes to trum Ezekial.  I did hear somewhere that in fundamentalist ideology, later passages supercede earlier ones and Ezekial is quite early, so it shouldn't be too hard to trump, but the later quotes must still be crystal clear, not implied or under the surface.

    Posted by Alan Ditmore on 09/07/2009 @ 09:37AM PT

  105. Alan Ditmore

    If the quotes I described don't exist, then the only option is to split the country into a Christian one and a secular one and resettle christians and gays in the wron areas like India and Pakistan and The Big Sort:

    http://www.thebigsort.com/maps.php

    Which gays are already getting pretty good about doing, as in Frisco and Provincetown, though neither has a gay majority yet.

    Good thing American gays are a good deal more mobile than south asian peasants.

    Posted by Alan Ditmore on 09/07/2009 @ 09:45AM PT

  106. Michael Nenzoski

    In Leviticus it states that man shall not lay with man as he lays with woman. That is all anybody, who truly believes, needs to read. If you are a follower of Jesus, who was Jewish in his earthly life, and followed the 10 commandments, you must strive to follow the example of Jesus. Jesus is proof that man must live a life without sin. We as humans will be tempted but temptation is not sin acting upon the temptation is the sin. As for the Constitution it states" Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievance." nowhere is the phrase seperation of church and state.

    Posted by Michael Nenzoski on 09/07/2009 @ 10:31AM PT

  107. Ronald Simkin

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" As I understand it, people examine this and in synopsis stated that this is by definition a "separation of church and state". It mandates that government (state) has no business meddling with the church. It is immaterial that the phrase used to define the clause is not within the clause, we should not expect it to be there.

    Posted by Ronald Simkin on 09/07/2009 @ 11:29AM PT

  108. Alan Ditmore

    "Congess" is the subject of the constitution, not states, or counties or towns either, which is why both gays and Christians need to hurry up and vote with your feet to establish majority towns and counties, which have NO CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON RELIGIOUS LAWS.  The town clearly isn't big enough for both of you so GET MOVING!

    http://www.thebigsort.com/maps.php

    The Christians are setting up in Anderson County South Carolina BTY, and Gays in Frisco and Provincetown MA, though both are a bit expensive and need to permit more housing to prepare for the influx.

     

    Posted by Alan Ditmore on 09/07/2009 @ 12:17PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  109. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. nenzoski...

    The first amendment is the very embodiment of seperation of church and state.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/14/2009 @ 03:08PM PT

  110. Reply to thread
  111. Ronald Simkin

    Homosexuality is only this tip of the ice-burg of the sexual sins rampant in our time. The Bible is a treasure for those who see sin as a disease and want to be healed. The Bible is not a base-ball bat to use against those who love sin and have no inclination to repent. The call to repent should be loving and kind, and those who make it clear that they do not wish to repent should be left alone, never harrased. (The Christian is clearly told to shake the dust off his shoes and move on when this happens.) "Christians" who handle these issues otherwise are religious idiots who de-fame the name of God.

    Posted by Ronald Simkin on 09/07/2009 @ 10:53AM PT

  112. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. simkin...

    Homosexuality is as natural and normal as heterosexuality and the only real sin is you bible thumpers using your religion to deny equality to others.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/14/2009 @ 03:16PM PT

  113. Reply to thread
  114. Andrew Heugel

    I like this post, as there has been far too much written about how "God" disapproves of homosexuality. I'm not a believer and have some difficulty understanding why people would choose to do what some people interpret an ancient text as saying, rather than following their own judgment regarding what is right.

    But, I realize that many are religious and do try to live their lives righteously according to scripture, so I appreciate this discussion about how the Bible and Jesus encourage tolerance, acceptance and love of others. There is far too much hatred, bigotry and war in this world, and any discussion of how we can become a more accepting and loving species is welcome.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/07/2009 @ 11:05AM PT

  115. Tom  Boughan

    There is a book written by John Boswell, a noted medieval scholar that even fundies quote. He wrote a book, Christianity, Homosexuality, and Tolerance. He recorded writings from Christian leaders for first thousand years of Christianity on homosexuality. It was ambiguous and ambivalent toward homosexuality. The Church then did not define homosexuality as we do in modern times. The original language could be translated as effemine, transvestite,hermaphrodite,or male temple prostitute. The last one is what Paul usual warn about,not homosexuality itself ,but male temple prostitutes that serve other gods and goddesses.

     It was King James who wanted it to translate man lying with men,because he hated his own homosexual tendencies. Keep that in mind when you read KIng James Version. The same could be where it mentioned witches and occult. The original word for witch was actually poisoner, but King James changed it witches. He made sure there were warnings about occultic practices, too, when it meant rituals for other gods and godesses. So, read it with that in mind and with grain of salt on how the Bible is translated to English. Tom

    Posted by Tom Boughan on 09/07/2009 @ 11:37AM PT

  116. Alan Ditmore

    The King James translation is definately a serious load of crap, but it is interesting that it is the Tea Party right that is advertising the Geneva translation.  There are modern translations too.  I wouldn't go near a King James if they paid me.

    Posted by Alan Ditmore on 09/07/2009 @ 12:06PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  117. Reply to thread
  118. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    I support Alex Montagna's opinion 110%.  Christians are the worst offenders of obnoxious behavior at times. This gentleman is free to read or not read any article he wishes!

    What gall!

    Dakotahgeo, Pastor/Chaplain!

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 09/07/2009 @ 11:53AM PT

  119. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    David Zellers and Ray G!

    I want to thank you for being two really great examples of why the Christian GLBT movement/support is growing so fast.

    Keep yourselves in line first, then worry about others! If you do that, you'll be so busy cleaning up your own lives, you won't have time to meddle in others' lives!

    Your arrogance knows no limits!
    Dakotahgeo, Pastor/Chaplain

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 09/07/2009 @ 11:57AM PT

  120. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    Sorry, Ray G, but after reading a majority of your posts, I don't know what side of the fence you're on. Hmmm!

    Dakotahgeo

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 09/07/2009 @ 12:09PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  121. Reply to thread
  122. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    Absolutely! King James did not have homosexual tendencies!  He WAS a homosexual.  More power to him, lolol.  And really, he didn't write the KJV, he only approved it.

    Dakotahgeo

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 09/07/2009 @ 12:22PM PT

  123. Scott Bailey

    Great point, K James, was for sure a homosexual and it was proved many times. Even if he did marry and father children, his lust for men was well documented.

    Posted by Scott Bailey on 09/09/2009 @ 06:51AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  124. Reply to thread
  125. Alan Ditmore

    Trust me you don't want these people for neighbors. so get moving, vote with your feet and move to Frisco or Anderson County SC respectively.

    http://www.thebigsort.com/maps.php

     

    Posted by Alan Ditmore on 09/07/2009 @ 12:28PM PT

  126. Dianne   Sahakian

    God made men and women what they are whether straight, gay, lesbian, BI or transgendered so who are we to decide and hate them, you don't see any of these people going around, raping and killing people do you?  Plenty of straight people do.  I want to be around loving and caring people that care for each other as Jesus preaches not hippocrites that are against everything. So everyone should be accepting of others that are different even if we arent that way ourselves.  In the christian bible Jesus accepted people the way they were, why shouldn't we?

    Posted by Dianne Sahakian on 09/07/2009 @ 01:24PM PT

  127. David Lowell

    There are so many "abominations" in Leviticus that apparently deserve the death penalty that I don't see why Christians insist on citing the anti-gay "abomination" verse to justify their shabby treatment of gays. How about quoting, instead, "Judge not, that ye be not judged."

    And the tale of Sodom and Gommorah is arguable at best. Even if you accept that it has to do with attempted rape and sodomy, the "good guy" in the story, Lot, offered the mob his virgin daughters instead. And that's supposed to be a lesson in morality?

    I don't think HRC or anyone else should attempt another interpretation of a book that was written millenia ago, by writers who had less knowledge of the world and human nature than the average eighth-grader of today. Why pretend that this book has valid lessons for us today?

    Posted by David Lowell on 09/07/2009 @ 02:15PM PT

  128. Rev. Judy Tergis

    Well said David. In fact the Bible seems like a curse on the planet.  It is a primer for the authoritarian 10% of the population who believe it is their right (destiny?) to control others especially women.  

    Three religions came from the "Old Testament" but Christianity has killed more than the other two combined when you add up the Crusades, the missionary led conquest of the Americas and the decimation of the indigenous populations there, the witch burnings of Europe and America, 

    Posted by Rev. Judy Tergis on 09/07/2009 @ 11:44PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  129. Reply to thread
  130. Sumner Peirce

    I'm glad that this HRC information is out there for those who need it but my fear is that those in the hierarchy of the various churches won't read it let alone put it to good use. 

    As for me, I gave up the G/god paradigm quite some time ago; and I find the Bible just one moral code among so many.

    Posted by Sumner Peirce on 09/07/2009 @ 02:19PM PT

  131. Tim Trent

    Those with a deep interest in the book of Leviticus shoudl consider this interesting yet somewhat technical paper Dear David, Homosexual Relationships, A Halakhic Investigation, by Israeli Rabbi Simchah Roth.  Parts of it take a bit of digesting.

     

    Posted by Tim Trent on 09/07/2009 @ 02:32PM PT

  132. Deborah "Dusty" Debandi

    Hi Folks, Wow what a diversity of comments that have been made here. Very Informative and enlightening. As I sit here reading over the numerous comments made, one of the things that I am brought back to time and time again is how the Bible is a book about love and how God, Christ, Jesus or whoever you choose to call Him...faithfully spoke out on love. "This is my commandment, that you love one another as Christ loved the Church", "Love your neighbor as you love yourself"...the Bible goes on and on about the topic of love. It also goes on to talk about judging one another lest you be judged.All too often people want to take Scripture out of content to fit their needs but don't read it in it's entireity. Say for instance that famous  1 Cor. Chapter 6 Verses 9-11 where it does mention homosexuality. It talks about how the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God and all too often the people tend to focus on those things that don't apply to THEMSELVES and focus on what others are doing such as when it comes to Homosexuality.The guilty shout the loudest! Yet in the Bible when it talks about homosexuality, it says ...do not be deceived, neither liars, theives, adulterers, fornicaters, idolaters, covetous, revilers, swindlers shall inherit the Kingdom of God so the next time you want to pass judgement on someone else....make sure your own back yard is clean first. Have you lied to anyone today? Cheated on your taxes? Coveting a girl/boyfriend or a new car, gambling or not practicing the Spiritual Principles of love that God wanted you to do????? Love one another - for THIS is the greatest command.  By the way, if no one has told you that they love you today...I love you and get some NEW people in your life.

    Posted by Deborah "Dusty" Debandi on 09/07/2009 @ 03:21PM PT

  133. Jamie Morvitz

    A lot of people have been saying that the Bible is against the sin of homosexuality, not against the sinner.  I am straight.  However, I know that homosexuality is not a choice and so to say that a gay person is just a person who continually sins is basically saying that the only way to not sin would be to deny their identity.  I think the main problem in the religious conservatives understanding gays is that they think gays have a choice and choose to "do wrong" in their eyes.  If they only understood that it is who they are, maybe they would see that if God created us all, God created them too, as they are.  Diversity is something to be celebrated and while at this point in time some people look down upon and in disgust at gays and lesbians, I only hope that this is overcome.  How many other things in history have people looked in disgust at only to completely accept later on in time?

    Also, if we think about how much time and energy and force religious conservatives are putting into opposing anything that would help gays, imagine how easily an real problem like rape or something else that both sides agree on could be solved!  We just need to have everyone put this much energy into more important issues.  The religious right needs to just leave the gays alone, realize that they can't help who they are and realize there is nothing to fear about them.

    Posted by Jamie Morvitz on 09/07/2009 @ 03:41PM PT

  134. Jon Bankes

    I used to be definable as someone who was constantly looking for the next drink, followed quickly by the next fight.  That was more than a set of acts, it was my identity, just as homo/heterosexuality can be seen as an identity for someone who is defined that way by society.  God created both of us, but He didn't intend for me to live that way.  He didn't give me the ability to change, He changed me.  I had no part in it other than admitting the life I was living was outside of His will. 

    There has been mention made of the 'perfect life' Christians are called to lead, with Christ as the example - its both more complex and more simple than that.  Jesus wasn't sent as an example of the life we had to work towards.  He was sent to pay the penalty for our complete inability to live that life.  He was sent to bridge the gap sin placed between God and mankind.  People tend to look at sins as misdemeanors or felonies or some such.  They're not something God tallies up against us that way.  To God, sin causes a complete separation of Him and us.  It only takes one.  One white lie.  One time of not listening to our parents.  One sin.  Nothing we can do can ever undo that.  A good life?  Worthless.  That's what we should have done all along, not something that pays the debt.  The only way the debt could be paid was for God to pay it Himself, and that's exactly why Jesus came.  He paid our debt.  Are you willing to admit you owe one?

    Posted by Jon Bankes on 09/08/2009 @ 06:05AM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  135. Reply to thread
  136. Matt Wisniewski

    The Bible is a very large book that has so much diversity that it can be cherry-picked to support nearly any viewpoint.  Even Hitler has quoted from the New Testament.   Please consider, however, the next time you disparage LGBT individuals that one of the commands Jesus gives His followers is to "...Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you."  (Matt 5:44)  To me this is unequivocal.  How can this be argued?

    Posted by Matt Wisniewski on 09/07/2009 @ 04:41PM PT

  137. Andrew Heugel

    There is a book by Robert Wright titled "The Evolution of God." This book describes how over time, "God" has become gentler and more loving to match the changes in this planet's cultures over time.

    We've moved from the agrarian societies of Biblical times, where the vast majority of people never ventured more than ten miles from their birthplaces, to today's world culture where there is instantaneous exchange of information between billions. As we've done this, we've become less provincial and more accepting of others differences. Some sects of some religions have been slow to leave the provincialism and xenophobia of the past behind them, but this change is inevitable, if our species is to evolve into the peaceful world culture that it can be where we accept a wide variety of cultures and lifestyles and celebrate the diversity of this world culture and the uniqueness of each of its members.

    The religious, non religious and the LGBT community are all part of our colorful cultural heritage and to be celebrated, not be the subject of the fear of the different and accompanying discrimination and hatred that should be buried in the past.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/07/2009 @ 05:13PM PT

  138. Matt Wisniewski

    Andrew, I smiled reading part of your comment: "Some sects of some religions have been slow to leave the provincialism and xenophobia of the past behind them".  Yes, some have, like the American conservative party & that chucklehead Sarah Palin.  Sorry ... couldn't resist.  :)

    Posted by Matt Wisniewski on 09/07/2009 @ 05:20PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  139. r conerly

    Not to be a hater... but, Matt, you are such a goober...

    Posted by r conerly on 09/09/2009 @ 03:20PM PT

  140. Reply to thread
  141. Andrew Heugel

    Matt,

    There's plenty of provincialism around the planet, and while reading about the Taliban earlier today, they're certainly prime examples. But, with our educational system and all the knowledge of the planet at our fingertips, we Americans have no excuse to be as ignorant of the rest of the world as we are on average as a people.

    As for Dear Sarah, I would find her humorous, except that so many Americans take her seriously, and that is scary!

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/07/2009 @ 05:31PM PT

  142. Lon Ball

    Shades of Sodom and Gemmorah, LGBT discussions from decades ago until now are full of rightful discussions about Civil Rights as a legal matter and really very little about health issues.  Health issues concerning LGBT people happen to be equally relevant to straights.  Lets talk about the yucky stuff that people are loath to talk about; what people do with sex and appropriate sex practices from a health perspective.  Lets talk about an increasingly heterosexual phenomenon in porn sites on the web; N0.#1 use of internet.  Lets talk about African hetero AIDS and birth control.  Yes, let talk about anal sex.

    Posted by Lon Ball on 09/07/2009 @ 06:42PM PT

  143. Thomas McHugh

    What about it mr. ball ?

    Both heterosexuals and homosexuals practise it...

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/14/2009 @ 03:37PM PT

  144. Reply to thread
  145. Ken  Kupstis

    Bishop John Shelby spong, in his must-read book "Rescuing the Bible From Fundamentalists", argues--quite convincingly--that Paul, author of most of the New Testament, was a closeted gay man (a lot of his letters testify to a 'sinful nature' he struggled with). Obviously this can't be proved or disproved, but it does show that one can be gay and still do important works for one's faith.

    Posted by Ken Kupstis on 09/07/2009 @ 07:00PM PT

  146. Andrew Heugel

    Lon,

    If we're going to talk about anal sex, etc., then we should talk about such protections as condoms to make such sex safer. There are too many people in high places (such as our previous president and the Pope) that insist that sex education begin and end with abstinence. While nothing can be lower risk than abstinence, expecting people to adhere to such a rigid standard is unrealistic, therefore unproductive.

    We need to deal with the real world. In the same vein, the vast majority of the LGBT community have no intention of getting the fear of God in their hearts and going straight. Therefore, those who believe that the Bible, Qua'ran, etc. preaches against this can either change their beliefs, continue to be bigoted, or choose to love their neighbors as they love themselves and not judge, lest they be judged.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/07/2009 @ 07:08PM PT

  147. Rob Tamaki

    I am a latecomer to this thread, a graduate level student in biblical studies, and a Deacon in a Baptist church that is currently wrestling with the question of how to express the radical welcome of God to those having a homosexual orientation.

    Let me say right off the bat, the title of the article is absolutely corrrect: The Bible is NOT about beating LGBT people up! 

    Instead, the Bible has as its central theme that of liberation and deliverance.  This is expressed right from the beginning stories of creation, through the stories of Exodus under Moses, through the period of monarchic establishment, through the Jewish return from exile, and most importantly, through the teachings and ACTIONS of Jesus.

    Contemporary New Testament scholarship has come to recognize that the Gospel writers (especially Matthew, Mark, and Luke) were vary carefully trying to portray Jesus as a New Moses, bringing about a New Exodus which applies to all humanity, and not just the Jewish people.

    The richness of the Bible is not that it merely points out a better way to live, or that it anounces the way of salvation (whatever that is), or that it challenges the oppressive structures of our world, but that it engages with the messiness and brokeness of the human condition, and in the midst of the chaos and misery in which we find ourselves, the Bible has the audacity to proclaim that this is not all there is.

    The Bible acknowledges and enters into the entrapment that we all experience whether personally, or corporately, whether it is imposed externally through oppressive societal structures, or internally through our innate propensity to act in ways that we know intrinsically (instinctually?) to be wrong.  It is this human pattern of oppression that is soundly and completely repudiated by the biblical story (though I fully recognize how Christians throughout the ages have missed out on this point, to the great discredit of the church).

    The wonder of the invitation of Jesus is that he calls us to come as we are, in whatever condition we are, in whatever state of brokeness we are. 

    However, when yielded into his hands, we cannot remain as we are. 

    Jesus' program of liberation and deliverance is about restoring us to what we are intended to be - it is about recovering our true humanity. This applies to all dimensions of our existence, whether to social or political structures, educational or religious communities, or to personal relationships and behaviours.

    So, yes, the Biblical narrative, understood broadly, throws open the doors widely to the LGBT community, just as it does for everyone else.  Yet, at the same time, once embraced, the biblical story cannot leave us unchanged. Rather, it commends us to a process of transformation whereby the clothing of our sinful selves is shed and we are re-clothed in such as way as to reveal our true humanity.  I am still wrestling with what this means for myself, let alone what it means for homosexuals.  But I know without a doubt, that there is a place for each one of us in the heart of God.

     

     

    Posted by Rob Tamaki on 09/08/2009 @ 12:36PM PT

  148. Sumner Ferris

    So little knowledge of history. One should be aware the early church was not fond of Christ and his teachings. The ORIGINAL bible was/is a collection of letters from Christ's followers (not the words of god). They were written in an ancient language,later translated to latin. In the translation words and meanings were changed because the word or phrase was not understood or because the translater did not agree with it. In the middle ages,there was a conference held by Constantine. There were many so-called books at this time. Constantine got all to finally agree to leaving some books out (those that might not share  the church's ideas and ambitions) When the printed word arrived,the bible (those books that survived) were again translated from latin.(a language only readable by the church). The CHURCH OPPOSED ORDINARY PEOPLE EVEN CLERGY reading the newly printed bible. This was one of the first inquistions by THE CHURCH. To CONTROL imformation,ideas and the TRUTH. The battle is still raging. THE CHURCH is opposed to homosexuality and abortion ONLY because it might limit the numbers of new members,as both interfear with new births. The CHURCH is and was about POWER,not the word of God. They claim to oppose the taking of life,YET have member in the armed services. They are FALSE. The pagan religions were not overthrown by christians. The PAGAN high priest became the pope. ONLY a title change. Most of the months are named for pagans as is the "day of whorship"  SUNDAY. The day of the SUN GOD.

    Posted by Sumner Ferris on 09/08/2009 @ 01:11PM PT

  149. Rob Tamaki

    Uh, Sumner, I'm afraid you're the one with little knowledge of history here.

    First of all, there are plenty of examples of the writings of the early church fathers that are extant today. Most of these writings profusely praise Christ and his teachings.

    Second, of the 66 books of the Bible, only the New Testament documents (26) can rightly be said to have been written by followers of Jesus.

    Third, the Old Testament was written primarily in Hebrew (with some Aramaic) which is a modern language, having been resurrected by modern Israel. The New Testament was written in Greek, the common form (e.g., 'street Greek'). We have an extensive collection of Greek manuscripts (>5000) dating from as early as the second century.  Modern translations are based upon the original Greek manuscripts, not on a Latin translation.There is a highly developed field of scholarship known as 'textual criticism', which allows us a high degree of certainty regarding the original text, and the translation of that text.

    Fourth, Constantine did not live in the middle ages.  Rather, he was Emperor during the fourth century. He convened the Council of Nicea in 325 shortly before his death in 327 to try to develop a consensus amongst the bishops over something called the Aryan controvery. However, there is no historical record of him (or anyone) at the Council banning or destoying any books apart from the symbolic tearing apart of the writings of Arius (which were rejected by the Council). The composition of the Bible that we have today was not finalized until 397 in Carthage.

    Your explanation for the traditional opposition of the church to homosexuality and abortion is patently absurd. Opposition to abortion is rooted in a biblical respect for life in all of its forms as a recognition that every person, in whatever stage of life, is created in the image of God (though, I don't condone every method used to express this opposition). Opposition to homosexuality is a little more complicated, but the motivations are far more sophisticated and nuanced than your silly assertion.

    Finally, perhaps it's time to put aside Dan Brown and his types and start reading the work of some trained historians and academics.

    Posted by Rob Tamaki on 09/08/2009 @ 11:37PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 2 people like this comment.   Like
  150. r conerly

    rob, rob, rob.. as you said, you were in 'biblical studies' ? too bad it wasn't history...

    BTW:  Baptist?

    Posted by r conerly on 09/09/2009 @ 03:31PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  151. Reply to thread
  152. Jeremy  Stuckwisch

    A loose and subjective interpretation of Mein Kampf might yield a message of hope and courage for oppressed people as well, but just like the bible it is book filled with hatred and xenophobia and should be discarded. I do not understand why the people who are most victimized by religion feel the need to slavishly appeal to its adherents. Discard that superstitious nonsense and focus on reality, that way we all might actually see some results.

    Posted by Jeremy Stuckwisch on 09/08/2009 @ 01:35PM PT

  153. Deborah "Dusty" Debandi

    Way to Go Rob. My Kudos to you. Finally someone who knows what their talkin about .....especially when it comes to history and what the Bible REALLY is all about and says. And I tip my hat off to you for not coming out with any judgemental attitudes about homosexulity. Thanks!

    Posted by Deborah "Dusty" Debandi on 09/09/2009 @ 06:31AM PT

  154. Otto VonAuchvetter

    We all sin, the Bible points this out to us so we may improve our lives

    Posted by Otto VonAuchvetter on 09/10/2009 @ 07:33PM PT

  155. Andrew Heugel

    Otto,

    This sounds like "Catholic guilt." I feel that we've need to lighten up regarding some of our concepts regarding "sin," or what's right and wrong. For instance, I don't see someone who covets as "sinning," because they didn't do the act. However, coveting can be an unproductive in terms of time spent on coveting and lead to other challenging behaviors, such as us making negative statements to others, due to the emotions involved.

    It's a basic a management concept that to get positive results out of employees, you have to mix in a lot of praise with any criticism, or else the person listening will tune you out. Also, you may have to lower the bar for people who are behaviorally, intellectually, or "morally" challenged lest they give up out of frustration. And, we all have to be open minded to the possibility that we as the teacher/supervisor may be wrong in some ways and always be willing to change our minds.

    Many religions are evolving for many people to reflect the changes in overall societal mores and the realities of human psychology. For non-believers and those who view such religious texts as the Bible, Koran and Rg Veda as inspired by God and the works of the people of those times, this is a natural evolution. For those who view your holy books as the literal and unchanging word of God, I ask you to look at the more forgiving passages and learn to love all your brothers and sisters, as God is said to love all of us, including all of us in the LGBT community.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/11/2009 @ 02:35AM PT

  156. Deborah "Dusty" Debandi

    FORTY YEARS OF HELL: I struggled when I was in 6th grade with Lesbian tendencies (1970)when being Gay REALLy wasn't cool and you had better stay in the closet if you what was good for you. For the sake of my " Sophiscated Parents"  I kept my feelings to myself  as I tried to come to a better understanding of what was going on with me. I did NOT want to be gay and I believed it was sin in God's eyes and I would go to hell. I later went onto College and got away from home and away from my parents where I was able to venture out and explore these avenues of my life but I just never could seem to get away from the feeling that I was somehow commiting sin so I started diving into the Bible to find out just what it had to say about it for myself. I read up on every Scripture that had anything to do with Homosexuality as well a sexual sin (believe me there were plenty of Scriptures both in the Old testiment and the New testiment) and well as the Scripture which said, "For those who continue to go on willifully sinning after haveing received the Knowledge of the Truth, to them there no longer remaineth a Sacrafice for Sin"as well as I started going to Church. I wanted...No, I needed some answers.  So I shared with my Paster (now at this time I had a partner of 2yrs) what was going on in my life suppossedly in confidence and the next Sunday after Church found myself surrounded by the Decons of the Church ...after Church and the Paster as he informed me that he had took it upon himself to share it with them as the Bible says to bring MY sin before the Decons and if I don't repent and turn away from my sin to bring it later before the Elders.  Well needless to say, me and my girlfriend did stay together and I was brought once again before the Elders of the Church to suppossedly repent of my "Sin". What I couldn't understand was how could I have started feeling a certain way at 11yrs. of age and it be called SIN? To me it was natural. I was still a child and was not even sexually active. I was just finding myself physically drawn towards woman , but I didn't know about sexual matters yet. Things were different back then! Back in the 70's for an 11yr. ?!?  How Could a loving God send me to hell for something that feels NORMAL to me and the touch of a man makes my skin crawl? I prayed to God to take it away, I've fought it, I've ignored it, I've gone as long as 5 yrs. without  but I don't want to be alone, and I've been kicked out of two Churchs - - -(I wonder if GOD was sitting in there) because of being Gay.  I even overdosed 3 times and eventually put a bullet in my head ending up in a comma for 3 weeks and a yrs. mandatory in a Mental Hospital behind all of this........WHY????????    Because Churches won't practices one simple rule of thumb. Love your neighbor as Christ LOVED THE CHURCH.  If you want to bring people into your Church .....you LOVE the into your Church.  If you want to Bring them to Christ....You love the to Christ!  If you want people to change...You love them to that change. And first and formost....YOU are NOT the one who changes them if they are to be changed...GOD is the one that changes them if God Wants them to be changed....but God accepts us all just as we are. He came for the sinner any way, not for tha self righteous son of a _ itch! I learned  finally to accept myself after 52 yrs. but it was a long hard road but it was no thanks to you so called  "loving" Christians!

    Posted by Deborah "Dusty" Debandi on 09/12/2009 @ 08:11PM PT

  157. Alan Ditmore

    People really need to be willing to leave churches that they disagree with or oppress them BEFORE shooting themselves.  I really have trouble believing that "the elders" dragged you out of your home and before them.  You must have gone back to the church, and I have limited sympathy for people who insist on returning to such abusers.

    I'm not a bible scholar, but if when read literally, the bible denounces gays, then the bible needs to be rejected outright.  Reading between the lines is an excersize in futility.

    Posted by Alan Ditmore on 09/13/2009 @ 02:15PM PT

    • Report close

      You must be signed in to report content.

    • 1 person likes this comment.   Like
  158. Reply to thread
  159. Deborah "Dusty" Debandi

    SIN  IS  SIN ! ! !  THERE IS NO BIG SIN OR LITTLE SIN IN THE EYE'S OF GOD!

    Posted by Deborah "Dusty" Debandi on 09/12/2009 @ 08:28PM PT

  160. Andrew Heugel

    Wow - what a story Deborah! I had just been reading some comments back and forth in this discussion regarding whether the Bible is the word of God or the word of man. Regardless of whether there is a God or not, or whether the Bible or any other book on Earth is his/her/its word, the reality is that many people do believe fervently and for them God is real.

    This is why those of you who speak on behalf of some God to other believers need to be careful about condemning others, as they could be like Deborah and go into a downward spiral into some personal hell. There are far too many things that we do to each other that cause hurt to condemn others for loving even if their love isn't what you feel is right in God's eyes.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/12/2009 @ 08:38PM PT

  161. Deborah "Dusty" Debandi

    Thank You VERY MUCH Andrew. I could NOT have said it better.  You know what gets to me is that while I had these so called tongue talkin, Bible toten, layin on of the hand "so-called-God-fearin-Christians" expellin me out of the Church because I wouldn't turn from "MY Sin"  I would watch and observe some of them and how they were living their lives... and it was quit a CONTRIDICTION to suppossedly what the Bible teaches.  Some of them I knew personally and knew that they were not married but were living together outside of marriage.  Is that not against what the Bible teaches?  Then, there were those who were cheating on their spouces.  Is not Adultery against what the Bible teaches?  Then there were those that came in with hang overs on Sunday from getting drunk the night before, but does the Bible not talk about drunkards and be Ye Not drunk with wine?   Then I would watch and listen to a variety of conversations and boy the gossip and the lies that I heard being told around that Congregation- yet it talks about,  "be ye not deceived ...neither liers, nor gossipers, nor adulterers, nor fornicators, nor idolitors, etc., etc., etc.,"  I think that you get my drift, " shall inherit the Kingdom of God".  Yet NEVER once did I sit back and pass judgement on them and their lives and what they were doing. That was not my job. That was God's job. My job was to love them and to pray for them.  God has to deal with their hearts and God KNOWS them inside out just like HE knows me inside out. God knows my personal struggles more than any mere man ever could and knows why I am the way that I am or how I got to be the way that I am. Do you know what the statitics  for people of child abuse leading to sexual deviation?  Often times women who were abused  by the opposite sex as children turn to the same sex later on in life and subconsciously may not even be aware that this is why they are doing this. It isn't until after many, many yrs. of long term therapy that they come to terms with their REAL sexual selves and Christians or "SO-CALLED-CHRISTIANS" with their self-righteous judgemental attitudes are NOT helping the healing process but are in fact hindering the process by already making a  woman who often times feels very unloved and far away and abandoned by God to feel that much more-so.  This is NOT to say that ALL Lesbians or Homosexuals have been abused...some ARE BORN that way by genetics thru no fault of their own,  yet the so-call loving Christians are going to persecute these people in the name of Jesus Christ and His Love and tell them how much God loves them....while YOU treat them like poop. When Are you folks going to start LIVING the BIBLE that YOU PREACH and TEACH instead of paying lip service to it???   And then you wonder why people don't want to come to Church and have no part of YOUR GOD.  The people on the street are kinder.   I was truely searching for answers and I had an open heart and an open mind back then....but after the way that I was treated - I will NEVER step foot back into a Church again.  I listen to Church on T.V. that way, I can't be thrown out.  Just call me....Loved by God Just As I Am!

    Posted by Deborah "Dusty" Debandi on 09/13/2009 @ 02:45PM PT

  162. Deborah "Dusty" Debandi

    Alan Dimwit -Oh, excuse me - I must have read your name wrong....just like you didn't read my article right.  I NEVER said that the Pastor and the Elders of that Church dragged me out of my home and before them.  PUT YOUR GLASSES on and read it again.  I have limited sympathy for uneducated people (people who don't know how to read) which seems to be your case.   A also stated that that was back in the 70's and I was young (around 18 or 19yrs. old) and as far as putting up with abuse from  Churches or anyone, I came from an abusive background where both of my parents were drug and alcohol were used and I lost my innocence when I was around 5yrs. old - so abuse was what I knew.  I got adopted when I was almost 15yrs. old after the courts came into the home and took us kids out when I was 11yrs. old.   I was seeking answers from God and thought that the Church was the place to find them.  At that age it never dawned on me that NOT  ALL Churches believed the same way and to go elsewhere where I might be more accepted.  As I said, I was young.  Your coldness eludes me!   And  as far as what you believe....I don't give a rats ass what you believe, but maybe had you read what I wrote correctly you would have understood what I said and believed me, but maybe not. Who knows, who cares ?!?  But there are lots of Churches out there doing this same thing and lots of impressionable young teens being influenced by such places and sadly some of these young people are people who come from abusive families where abuse is the "norm" and they don't know any better.  They don't know to RUN and keep on running.  They just know that same ole vicious cycle.  SO,  what happened to make your heart so cold ?!?

    Posted by Deborah "Dusty" Debandi on 09/13/2009 @ 03:57PM PT

  163. Andrew Heugel

    Thomas McHugh:

    I've just finished reading a number of your comments denigrating both the Bible and the people who believe in it. I am not a believer, but find find a number of faults with your logic.

    1) Many Christians and people of other religions do accept the LGBT community.

    2) There is a significant percentage of non believers who do not accept the LGBT community.

    3) Most educated theologians do not take the Bible or any other religious text literally.

    The premise of this post is that there are religious people and religious institutions that do not preach hatred of the LGBTcommunity and are instead about love and acceptance. As you point out, the Bible does have many contradictions. As others have pointed out, some cherry pick what they want oot of this and other religious texts. As some cherry picking is needed, if one is to arrive at a consistent whole, I encourage people to cherry pick the parts about love, acceptance, not judging others and treating your neighbor as you would have them treat you.

    As this post is about finding acceptance of diversity and love in religious communities, I feel that we who are non religious should practice the same and not be prejudiced toward those who believe in God and that some religious text is his/her/its word. We all share a fragile ecosystem called Earth and we would be much more successful in our stewardship of this unique planet, if all of us, both religious and non believers learn to accept others for who they are and find reasons to love each of our brothers and sisters.

    Please, let's put aside the hatred and bigotry of the past and move toward what could be a bright future for humankind and our planet where we each celebrate the diversity and richness of every culture and member of the world community. Yes, I know some would call this a dream, but such religious people as Martin Luther King had this dream as did non religious people like John Lennon. I ask for each of you who believe in their dream to embrace the strategy of such people and Gandhi and Mandela as well as you can and work on finding ways to make peace and love.

    If we each work to improve ourselves bit by bit to being more loving and accepting of others and helping and advocating for those in need, then we'll be doing our part toward making this world a better place. We only have control of ourselves and the best way for each of us to lead is by example.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 09/15/2009 @ 08:00PM PT

  164. Thomas McHugh

    Mr. heugal...

    Yes, I condemn the bible, in particular the old testement and I make no apologies for that.

    1 : Yes...I know there are some christians who accepts others as they are and as Ive pointed out elsewhere, these are true christians while those who seek to legislate their "morality" onto others through secular law are not true christians at all.

    2 : In all the time Ive been on this site and online in general, the majority of the homohaters that Ive encountered are indeed religious.

    3 : Thats it right there sir...Educated.

    I would wager that those who do take the bible literaly are nowhere near as educated in the original meaning of biblical verses as they would like to appear.

    I find it of intrest that true christians tend to ignore the parts of the bible which speaks of hate and intollerance while fundemental christians ignore everything but...Very intresting indeed.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 10/14/2009 @ 04:04PM PT

  165. Reply to thread
  166. Lon Ball

    Andrew's is a well reasoned response and consistent with Christian values.

    Posted by Lon Ball on 09/17/2009 @ 12:31AM PT

  167. Lon Ball

    I am finishing up a book that will interest you all; a novel, The Shack by Wm Young.  It is in novel form because as an academic and theological treatise it would have been rejected.  As it is, it is turning heads to introspection about the real love of God.  After the first 100 pages it consists of a man's conversations with God, who's young daughter was murdered by a pervert.  What ensues is a reaffirmation of God's love of all his creation and humanity,  reconciliation, love and care of all of humanity.  Well worth the healing read...for all of faith and doubt.  It takes the reader beyond the great hump of judgmentalism.

    Posted by Lon Ball on 09/18/2009 @ 12:53AM PT

  168. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    Very, very good book! Your report is "right on!" If one cannot afford it, check it out at your local library, or a church library!

    Dakotahgeo

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 10/14/2009 @ 05:34PM PT

  169. Reply to thread
  170. Andrew Heugel

    Judging by the various ways that people use the Bible to justify their beliefs and actions, it seems plain to me that the Bible can be used either as an inspiration to help and love others or as a justification for bigotry, hatred and persecution of those who are different. Thus, I feel that most impartial scholars of the Bible would say the Bible isn't about beating LGBT people up. So, I wish that those who have a problem with LGBT people would just state what it is, rather than using the Bible or "God" as an excuse for your behavior.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 10/14/2009 @ 05:16PM PT

  171. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    Andrew!!!  THANK YOU so much for saying again what I have reiterated for years.  Too many use God, God's Word (and it is not inerrant!), and anything Godly, as a weapon to force or coerce a person into believing as they do.  This is not smart; in fact, reverse psychology usually kicks in and the perpetrator has already lost the battle.
    Blessings, Peace, Hope, Joy,

    Dakotahgeo! M.Div. Pastor/Chaplain

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 10/14/2009 @ 05:32PM PT

  172. George M Melby, Pastor/Chaplain

    In response to Rev. Judy Tergis (where is your post??), it has always been my contention that were Jesus to return in the midst of a gathering of christian extremists, he might luck out and last 3 weeks; when they finally figured out who Jesus was, I figger 3 hours at the most!  We haven't moved very far, have we?  Ugh! (Shivers upon shivers!!!)

    Pastor Dak!

    Posted by George M Melby, Pastor/Chap... on 10/14/2009 @ 08:21PM PT

  173. Andrew Heugel

    The tricky thing about the posts in these discussions Dak is that responses to other posts appear below that post and not in chronological order. That drove me a bit crazy at first and is definitely a hassle regarding a discussion such as this where there are well over 100 posts.

    In any case, I'm always amazed how different people reading the same religious text, be it the Old Testament, New Testament, Koran, Vedas or Sutras can come up with so many different interpretations. This is why I prefer to use logic in any of my arguments, rather that justifying my viewpoint by some quote, religious or not.

    I also believe that when one is unsure, it's best to err on the side of acceptance, compassion and love.

    Posted by Andrew Heugel on 10/14/2009 @ 08:57PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Michael Jones

Michael is the Communications Director for the Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School, and previously was Communications Director for Pax Christi USA, a progressive Catholic human rights organization.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.