Gay Rights

Should LGBT People Be Losing Patience With Obama?

Published September 08, 2009 @ 04:26PM PT

Barack Obama

There's that leftover line from the 2008 Presidential campaign that "you campaign in poetry, but govern in prose." Lately for President Obama, it seems that his administration might have hit a streak of writer's block when it comes to the art of governing.  And that's leaving some people -- including the openly gay man who ran candidate Obama's field operations - a bit frustrated.  Especially when it comes to LGBT rights.

Steve Hildebrand, who by many respects helped launch Obama thru Iowa and into the heart of the primaries last year, said in an interview with Politico today that he's losing patience with the 44th president, and with Democratic leaders in Congress.  "I am one of the millions of frustrated Americans who want to see Washington do more than it's doing right now," said Hildebrand.  "I gave up a lot to elect Democrats, and I expect them to give it up for me. I'm going to speak loudly."

For many, Hildebrand is speaking truth to power here.  There are countless people who think that Obama and Congress are taking too long to affect the type of change they were elected to make.  They're seeing that on the issue of health care.  They're seeing that on the issue of labor.  And certainly they're seeing that on the issue of LGBT rights.

To his credit, Obama has made some changes.  Under Obama's watch, the U.S. has signed onto a UN statement in support of the global decriminalization of homosexuality.  His Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, said that protecting the human rights of LGBT people worldwide would be a priority for this administration.  Earlier this summer, Obama commemorated the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall Riots with a reception at the White House for scores of LGBT leaders and allies.  And most recently, Obama awarded Presidential Medals of Freedom to two LGBT icons -- Billie Jean King and (posthumously) Harvey Milk.

But while these steps have been welcomed, many LGBT folks are seeing nothing but delays and Congressional hold-ups when it comes to some of the campaign promises Obama made last year.  That includes passing a hate crimes bill, passing an Employment Non-Discrimination Act, repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and integrating the U.S. military, and overturning the "Defense of Marriage Act" (DOMA).  To make matters worse, Obama's administration has tripped up a few times, most notably with the Justice Department's bizarre brief defending DOMA in U.S. courts.

Hildebrand allows the slow progress on LGBT rights -- as well as issues like health care -- to be shared all around.  Yes, it's partly Obama, Hildebrand says.  But it's also the Blue Dogs in Congress who try to compromise too much on the issues that Democrats were resoundingly elected over this past year.

"There's basically three different parties, and one of those parties tends to be the barrier to getting anything done — and that's the Blue Dogs in the House and the moderates in the Senate," said Hildebrand.  "Change is not going to come by people in the Beltway deciding we should have change. It’s going to come because they’re feeling pressure from all over the country."

So who's to blame for the slow progress?  Congress?  Obama?  Both?

Perhaps the biggest concern, one could argue, is that if these historic pieces of legislation can't make it through the 111th Congress - ending DOMA, repealing "Don't Ask," enacting hate crimes legislation and passing an employment non-discrimination bill - could they possibly be even more delayed in the 112th Congress?  Especially, as experts ranging from Charlie Cook to Nate Silver point out, Democrats lose seats in 2010?

Now that's something that gets the blood pressure going.  With control of the White House, U.S. Senate, and the U.S. House, there's a feeling that everybody is governing as if they're stuck in a big bowl of Cream of Wheat.

But moreover, how is it that the Bush administration, with a bare majority of Congress, was able to shove so much down our throats, but the Obama administration, with majorities not seen by any party in decades, is seemingly stuck?

Perhaps that's the source of the frustration.  Both for those passionate about LGBT rights, as well as those working for better labor practices, a national health care system, and a whole host of progressive causes that have been largely dormat for more than eight years.

(Photo courtesy of gingerbydesign's photostream on Flickr.)

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (10)

  1. Edwin Bonilla

    President Obama and Congress are obligated to repeal 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell', make the bill become law which would add sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of hate crimes, and make the bill prohibiting workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation law. It's good that President Obama has stated that he will sign the two bills and support the repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'. His defense of DOMA is a mistake but at least there's a lawsuit against it.

    Posted by Edwin Bonilla on 09/08/2009 @ 06:28PM PT

  2. Thomas McHugh

    With all due respect to those of you who are as frustrated as I am...I would like to point out that while the repugnicons and the bible thumpers oppose a lot of what obama would want to do...They clearly didnt mind the crap that wrong way bush wanted and I believe that thats the biggest difference...Plus the fact that obama hasnt even made it through his first year yet so while his justice department definatly pissed me off when they filed their first rebuttal in favor of doma...Im willing to wait a little longer to see what obama can pull out of his hat.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/08/2009 @ 10:28PM PT

  3. Ioan Lightoller

    Sorry, Thomas, but I feel constrained to disagree. Obama has danced around every issue that is important to GLBTQ people because he so fears upsetting the bigots. If he was behind things like the repeal of DOMA and DADT, it would go a LONG ways towards getting these noxious things repealed. Instead, he has said or done NOTHING to indicate he has any intentions of trying to deliver on his campaign promises. So far as I know, he remained silent even as DOMA was defended and LGBTQ people were reviled as pedophiles and beastialists. My patience with the man is exhausted. With Obama it's "You have a fierce advocate when it comes to whatever gets  me the most votes in 2012."

    Posted by Ioan Lightoller on 09/09/2009 @ 06:11AM PT

  4. Thomas McHugh

    Well, again, I think we should give him some more time on this...I mean, if the repugnicons are giving him this much hell just on the health care reform fight then you can just imagine how hard it will be for him to fight for equality which I still believe he wants...

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/09/2009 @ 09:09PM PT

  5. Reply to thread
  6. Chris Marshall

    Even if Obama does live up to his promises I see the veto on any legislative measure that gives us anything more than second class civil unions. Obama has made it painfully clear that he does not support allowing us LGBT to have the same rights as him and be be treated as normal, because of this countries time honored "tradition" that marriage should be "between one man and woman." He is nothing more than a segregationist and that will never change. He is no better than those who wave the confederate flag and say they do it out of heritage while its symbol is one of hate and their motives are entirely toxic. Back in the day it was heritage that was used to oppress people like obama and his family, now Obama uses "tradition" to oppress us and our families. Go figure eh?

    As long as we continue to elect politicians that feel we are not normal, feel we are not equal, and feel that separate and unequal is ok, we will never get our full equal rights. It's time we stop voting for the right and right of center thinkers (democrats and republicans) and start voting for the left ones (independents, libertarians). And for those out there who think seperate but equal is a good start... well look at how the UK federal courts label gay people; "below human." We as a people and as a nation need to stop tolerating intolerance because it just happens to be someones "beliefs" and stamping it out one bigot at a time. Let us make Obama our first.

    Posted by Chris Marshall on 09/09/2009 @ 06:55AM PT

  7. Thomas McHugh

    Well, obviously we need more gay politicians AND gay friendly allies in goverment...

    Hopefully that will happen more and more.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/09/2009 @ 09:11PM PT

  8. Reply to thread
  9. Barbara McNamara

    I really was annoyed when I heard Obama say, even before the election, that he was in favor of the rights afforded in civil unions to the LGBT community , but that he did support the "traditional" concept that marriage is between a man and a woman. I voted for him because of the many other things he stood for, and because I believed he was a thousand times better in so many ways than his opponents, especially McCain. But even taking the 'marriage' issue off the table does not excuse him for not repealing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell', getting rid of DOMA, which should have never been allowed, not passing strong hate crimes legislation and a non discrimination bill. These issues do not require a lot of debate or compromise. Either you pass it or you don't. The ideas set forth in them are easy to understand. Why President Obama is dragging his feet is a mystery to me. These are civil rights issues. Equal marriage under the law is also a civil rights issue, but so many people, even the centrists don't seem to agree.

    President Obama has to openly declare that all discriminations against LGBT persons must end, and that he will enact strong and EFFECTIVE legislation to support this; he must prove to the American people that he will stand by his promises, or he becomes a hypocrite. However, it is even more than that; he was elected because many, many people have put their faith and trust in him, and believed that he will aggressively move us into a new era of tolerance and human rights. This was the campaign that I firmly believed he was running on.

    I can only think of one major reason for his ineffectiveness, and that is that this health care reform bill has gotten so complicated and distracting because of Congressional and lobbying opposition, that he is hesitating to even address any other 'radical' idea (let's face it, equal human rights for the LGBT community is, sadly, a radical idea for many people).  I think he was certain that all of Congress would be willing to reach some kind of GENUINE bi-partisan agreement as to health care reform, and that he believed it should have been a 'done deal' by now. But everyone can see how ugly this has gotten. I could understand why he has made this reform a priority. With that out of the way, he would be able to address the other issues that, obviously many Congressional Republicans and Blue Dogs will continue to fight him on, tooth and nail. It just seems like his entire presidency is going to be an uphill battle to keep the many promises he has made during his campaign.

    Posted by Barbara McNamara on 09/09/2009 @ 09:35AM PT

  10. Thomas McHugh

    I agree miss mcnamara and I also suspect that the biggest reason why the health care reform fight's gotten so nasty is at least in part due to the conservative's fear of obama actually trying to keep his promises to the gay community...

    Thats the primary reason why I think we should give him more time and support...

    Especially on his health care plan.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/09/2009 @ 09:15PM PT

  11. Reply to thread
  12. Barbara McNamara

    Oh, one more thing. Did the Matthew Shepperd Act pass, or are we still waiting for it to become a law?

    Posted by Barbara McNamara on 09/09/2009 @ 09:42AM PT

  13. Thomas McHugh

    I dont think so but then, I havent heard much about it for awhile.

    Posted by Thomas McHugh on 09/09/2009 @ 09:16PM PT

  14. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Michael Jones

Michael is the Communications Director for the Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School, and previously was Communications Director for Pax Christi USA, a progressive Catholic human rights organization.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.