Harvey Milk Must Be Rolling in His Grave
Published November 16, 2008 @ 01:15PM PT
Ugh, the height of hypocrisy.
Alan Stock, the Cheif Executive Officer of Cinemark, gave nearly $10,000 to pass Proposition 8 in California, and steal the right to marry away from gay and lesbian couples. Now, he's hoping to reap profits from the November 26 opening of "Milk," the much anticipated film chronicling the life of gay rights activist and political leader Harvey Milk. If only Milk were alive today, he'd be leading the boycott against Cinemark.
Thankfully, gay rights activists are taking note of this twisted irony. A site has launched, No Milk for Cinemark, calling attention to Stock's attempt to have his cake (no gay marriage) and eat it too (reap money from "Milk" screenings). Check the site out. Join their Facebook group. Print out a downloadable flyer and distribute it wherever you can. And when "Milk" opens up on November 26, go see it at a competitor's theater.
For information on how you can find a movie theater that is not Cinemark, go to No Milk for Cinemark's Web site.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
The Week of Milk
-
A Conversation with Cinemark over LGBT Rights
-
The Top Ten LGBT Rights Moments of 2008
Comments (4)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Is this not the same hypocrosy as Tom Lee Jone, Jamie Foxx, Oliver Stone, Sly Stallone and others who have jumped all over the no war in Iraq yet make money making war movies and then have the nerve to protest and make light of the Women and Men that serve the country and the world.
Makes you think?
Posted by Louis Corsetti on 11/17/2008 @ 06:27AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The irony and hyprocrisy are obvious, but I'm wondering what would have happened if he had gone the other way. Say Alan Stock refused to show the movie at Cinemark theaters because he didn't agree with its message. Wouldn't there be a larger outcry over that?
Posted by Mark Dimas on 11/17/2008 @ 01:31PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Louis, i dont think any of those celebrities make light of the sacrifice the men and women in our armed forces serving in iraq make and the debt that we owe them. they make war movies to shine a light on the situation and hopefully to make everyone, no matter what their opinion on the war is, think about the personal sacrifices that every soldier makes. if you ask anyone who is against the war what they will think, im pretty sure they will say it is the war they are against, and not the people on the ground fighting that war. in fact, ive NEVER heard anyone disparage a soldier, ever.
now, back to the actual topic of this discussion thread. mark raises a good point above, what if cinemark had refused to show the movie? i think he followed his (misguided and ignorant) conscience on the donation front but recognizes that he runs a business. he's definitely a hypocrite--but, since he appears to be all about the bottom line maybe a boycott will actually hit him where it hurts!
Posted by rosanne brooks on 11/17/2008 @ 02:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Good points, Rosanne. The boycott also proves that peasants aren't as stupid as these CEOs like to think...
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 11/21/2008 @ 08:36PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.