Arizona's Forgotten Proposition

Published October 29, 2008 @ 08:17PM PT

arizona With all of the attention going toward neighboring California's Proposition 8, many are overlooking the fact that for the second time in a row, Arizona voters will be voting on a statewide proposition to ban gay marriage. With an Arizona Senator at the top of the GOP presidential ticket, this could spell trouble at the ballot box for LGBT rights.

One might start to wonder if Arizona's nickname is "The Redundancy State." Arizona's Proposition 102 seeks to amend the state constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman. It's a similar proposition that, much to the shock of most people, failed in 2006. And did we mention that in 1996, Arizona passed a state law banning same-sex marriage?

When Arizona voters rejected the proposition in 2006 to rewrite marriage discrimination into the state constitution, it became the first state to reject such a measure. Up until that point, 27 states had placed constitutional amendments banning gay marriage on the ballot, and all 27 had them pass. But 2008 is looking like a different story.

Opponents of gay marriage, led by Focus on the Family, have raised a staggering $7 million to support Proposition 102, while LGBT rights organizers have raised less than 10 percent of that amount. Some of that may have to do with the large outpouring of funds into California to defeat Proposition 8. But the net effect is that gay marriage opponents are saturating the state with propaganda for Prop 102, in a state where GOP turnout could be high with John McCain at the top of the ballot.

Arizona-based LGBT rights groups are doing amazing work to fight back this proposition. Wingspan, Equality Arizona, and Vote No on Prop 102 have all been leading the way to defeat this anti-gay measure. Check them out, and let's make all four of these ballot initiatives - California, Florida, Arkansas, and now Arizona - fail on November 4.

Share this Post

Comments (1)

Well, I know one thing the ther arizonan's might not,Meahan McCain will vote against such a prop.

Posted by G R on 03/24/2009 @ 06:28PM PT
- Report close
  You must be signed in to report content.
- Reply
- Like
For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

reply to thread started by by G
Check Spelling
- Email me when there are new posts to this thread
- Comment Policy
Cancel Reply

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:

Create Password:

Comment

Check Spelling

Email me when there are new posts to this thread
Comment Policy

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Michael is the Communications Director for the Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School, and previously was Communications Director for Pax Christi USA, a progressive Catholic human rights organization.