Anti-Gay Leaders Continue to Seek Ballot Measures to Repeal LGBT Rights
Published December 31, 2008 @ 10:14AM PT
If Prop 8's passage woke the LGBT community up and told us that we need to learn how to organize better, it also reaffirmed a core belief among anti-gay forces that the ballot box can be used as a weapon to repeal gay rights. Anti-gay activists have never been a stranger to ballot measures that seek to repeal civil rights. From Anita Bryant's crusade in the 1970s to repeal Miami-Dade's anti-discrimination measure, to the infamous Briggs Amendment, to the whirlwind of anti-gay marriage measures on the 2004 ballot, to 2008, which saw anti-gay ballot measures pass in four states.
Sadly, it's a trend that's going to continue into 2009, most likely.
Here's a brief tale of two recent gay rights initiatives that are facing backlash from anti-gay groups. The first is a Kalamazoo, Michigan ordinance passed earlier this month that expands civil rights protections to LGBT citizens in regards to housing and employment discrimination. It's a simple anti-discrimination bill, but conservative activists, led by the American Family Association of Michigan (AFAM), are seeking to repeal the ordinance. Apparently discrimination is still fashionable for the AFAM. Activists with the AFAM need to get 1,300 signatures by today to put a repeal of the ordinance on the ballot. (Note: Read this article for a recap on how folks with the AFAM are lying and manipulating voters in order to get their needed signatures. They're actually appealing to fears that residents will have to share a bathroom with someone of the opposite sex if the ordinance is allowed to stand. Ridiculous.)
The second tale is from Cleveland. Earlier this month, the City Council of Cleveland voted 13-7 to establish a domestic partnership registry. It's a largely symbolic act, since the registry is non-binding, but the hope is that the registry fosters an inclusive reputation for Cleveland and provides a space where other businesses and employers might feel welcome to provide health care benefits to the same-sex partners of their employees. But now a group of pastors are pushing back against the registry, and are trying to obtain 11,000 signatures by next Wednesday (January 7) to put a repeal of the registry on the next municipal ballot. Their reasoning for wanting to repeal a non-binding, largely symbolic registry? Well, according to Pastor C. Jay Matthews, "that [homosexual] lifestyle goes against God."
Both of these examples are frightening, in that in both cities you have radical conservative elements waging a fight not over the issue of marriage, but on the basic issue of whether LGBT persons deserve basic civil rights. But this is also a moment to show that the movement for LGBT rights can fight fire with fire. The evidence? Both AFAM and the pastors in Cleveland are in the minority in their opposition to these measures, and LGBT rights groups will be better organized in 2009 than they've ever been before.
Right now, 87 percent of U.S. citizens think that LGBT people shouldn't be discriminated against in the workplace. And 73 percent favor some sort of domestic partnership that allows same-sex couples to share benefits, Social Security, health visitation privileges, and inheritance rights. That's not only a majority of the country, that's a landslide of the population.
Pastor Matthews and the AFAM are just simply wrong on these issues, both politically and religiously. Let's hope their signature campaigns fall flat. But barring that, if it's a fight they want, it's a fight they'll get on these issues.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Gay Rights Advancing in the Heartland
-
The Ghost of Anita Bryant in Kalamazoo?
-
The 50 Spot: Legalizing Gay Adoption in Florida
Comments (5)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Mea maxima culpa !!
Yes, we are a secular and pluralistic nation. Yes, we have a nation where both atheist and a plethora of theists promote their brand. Yes, we have secular theists and we have theocratic theists.With the ascent of Ronald Reagan, the Falwell-Dobson-Robertson triumvirate hijacked the soul of the Republican Party.
On their way to establish a Theocratic Evangelical Protestant Fundamentalist United States, they isolated two important civil rights positions in order to both promote and fund their new GOP brand. Women's Rights, especially Roe v Wade, and a woman's right to choose, and LGBT Rights, especially Same-Sex equality in the state of Civil Marriage.
In the last two and a half decades, hundreds of millions of dollars have been sent to these "Protestant Popes" - who have established brainwashing "universities", created lavish and palatial lifestyles - from some of the poorest among us - who often leave their own pastors destitute in the process while these local pastors baptize their young, marry their youth, and bury their elders.
Theocracy removes the barrier between church and state. Theocracy begins with blurring the barrier. There is nothing theological about the civil holiday called "Christmas" or the civil status called "Marriage."
Theocrats KNOW that there is no SECULAR or LEGAL reason to deny gay and lesbian Americans with the right to marry the same sex, under the same laws as heterosexual Americans unless they create a "particular theocratic viewpoint" to this issue or abortion.
This is why the reactionaries among them want to recriminalize sodomy and the moderates among them want to give us something less than separate but equal - fearing that the LAW will give us our basic equal civil rights.
I began by faulting myself. It is time for New Year Resolutions, is it not. The Canadian LGBT brand is successful. They have had full equal rights for years now on a federal level.
They have Hate Crimes, ENDA, Immigration Rights, Federal Marriage rights, Pension Rights......etc....and they accomplished this with a legal team who fought the lawyers and the legislators, while the gay clergy engaged the Pharisees.
We must do more......or turn our collars.....
Posted by A B on 12/31/2008 @ 12:50PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Personally, I am straight, but I have a sister who is lesbian, and I love her to death. Her orientation doesn't make her any less of a person than everyone else. I can't believe people just can't get over this. It's a new day and age. Love is love. Accept it.
Posted by M N on 01/05/2009 @ 05:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thank you, Miranda....you know, my 95 year old mother is straight. My two brothers are straight, and ditto my spouse's family.....and we suspect that our son will be straight as well, at least his fickleness with girlfriends in pre-K and now kindergarten.
Posted by A B on 01/05/2009 @ 06:00PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Obviously you completely missed my point and felt like being an ignorant asshole, but hey, we all have our days.
Posted by M N on 01/06/2009 @ 07:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We obviously missed each other's points, since I was agreeing with you and adding irony to the mix.
I have admittedly many faults well practiced over 63 years of life, but your description of me, well...............as you said, we all have our days.......
Posted by A B on 01/07/2009 @ 04:38AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.