A Few Statistics on LGBT Issues
Published October 06, 2008 @ 04:59AM PT
As the saying goes, statistics can be defined as "a body of methods for making wise decisions in the face of uncertainty." In regards to LGBT rights, statistics show not only how far we have to go yet in the struggle for equality, but also how far we've come. Below are a series of statistics on a range of LGBT issues from gay marriage to anti-discrimination.
MILITARY SERVICE
24 Countries:
Twenty-four countries [not including the U.S.] currently allow gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military, according to the Service Members Legal Defense Network. Of these twenty-four countries, twenty-two are part of coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan – meaning that openly gay and lesbian soldiers from Allied Forces are serving alongside U.S. troops, despite the continued U.S. ban. In July, more than 50 retired U.S. Generals and Admirals released a statement calling on the U.S. Congress to repeal the ban on openly gay and lesbian soldiers serving in the military, the largest number of military officials calling for a ban to date. To date, the U.S. has discharged over 11,000 service members for being gay or lesbian.
GAY MARRIAGE
Seven Countries:
Marriage between same-sex couples was first made legal in the Netherlands in 2001. Since then, six additional countries have passed legislation to recognize marriage rights for GLBT citizens. Spain is the only country in the world that recognizes same-sex marriage and heterosexual marriage under the same law.
Two States:
Same-sex marriage is also legal in two U.S. states, Massachusetts (2004) and California (2008), and in July 2008, New York’s Governor ruled that same-sex marriages conducted out-of-state must be recognized by the state of New York. Four additional states recognize civil unions between same-sex couples: Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey and New Hampshire. Meanwhile, several states have domestic partnership laws that grant certain benefits to same-sex couples. These states include Oregon, Maine, and Washington, as well as the District of Columbia.
26 States:
On the flip side, twenty-six U.S. states have passed constitutional amendments explicitly banning same-sex marriage, while eighteen states have passed statewide laws that recognize marriage as between a man and a woman. According to the National Association of Social Workers, prohibiting marriage protection to same-sex individuals denies them 1,000 federal protections and responsibilities granted to heterosexual individuals. Opponents of same-sex marriage have also been championing Proposition 8 in California, a statewide ballot measure that would rescind marriage rights for GLBT citizens in that state.
EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION
13 States:
There are currently thirteen states, as well as the District of Columbia, that have enacted policies to protect against gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination in employment. Seven states, meanwhile, have laws that prohibit employment discrimination solely based on sexual orientation. In thirty states, LGBT citizens can be fired on the basis of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity without any legal recourse.
39 Percent:
As late as 2005, 39 percent of all LGBT workers reported experiencing some sort of workplace discrimination or harassment. Recent polling, however, suggests that more Americans view equal rights in the workplace as a moral issue.
90 Percent:
Nearly 90 percent of people in the U.S. believe that gay and lesbian workers should have the same rights as their heterosexual counterparts.
HIV/AIDS
3,000:
The first HIV/AIDS cases in the United States were detected in 1981, in California and New York. Just two years later, in 1983, more than 3,000 AIDS cases had been identified in the States, and more than 1,000 people had died from the disease.
38,000:
By 1986, more than 38,000 worldwide had been diagnosed with the disease, though the Reagan Administration had only officially recognized the disease in September 1985.
8,000,000:
By the end of the decade, more than eight million people worldwide would have HIV/AIDS. Reagan himself, in 1990, would eventually apologize for his administration’s failure to respond to the disease.
71 Percent:
As of June 2007, according to the Center for Disease Control, 71 percent of those in the U.S. infected with HIV/AIDS were “Men who have sex with men” (MSM).
46 Percent:
Moreover, CDC studies indicated that as of 2005, the incidence rate of HIV/AIDS in black MSM (46 percent) was more than twice of that among white MSM (21 percent). Today, in the U.S., more than 230,000 gay men have HIV/AIDS.
33.2 Million:
The World Health Organization and UNAIDS estimate that, worldwide, 33.2 million people are living with HIV/AIDS.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
An LGBT Person's Guide to the Contemporary History of the United States: 1981-present
-
Ten LGBT Court Cases that Changed the Gay Rights Movement
-
Controversies in the LGBT Rights Movement
Comments (5)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















The most recent developments in Arizona, Florida, Arkansas, and especially California bring great sorrow to my heart. As I sat on the sofa with my boyfriend and listened to Obama's inclusion of gay people in his acceptance speech, tears of joy welled in my eyes. However, upon waking the next morning and learning of the multiple steps backward the nation has taken concerning GLBT civil rights, I was left extremely saddened and jaded.
I felt as though communities around the country, whom the GLBT community has historically not just stood with, but fought for, turned their backs on us and deliberately labeled us as second class... no longer even "separate but equal"... but instead, morally separate and civilly unequal.
The GLBT community must remove our fight from the legislative forum and the voting booths. We must pursue our civil rights, not via the electorate, but instead, we must appeal to the courts. Civil rights mustn't be left in the hands of the populous. The rights of minorities cannot be dependant on the temperament of the majority.
As long as a union between two committed adults is recognized as a civil contract and awarded state benefits, then that union should be a civil right and an institution into which all people should be able to enter.
Welcome to the Selma, round two.
Posted by Shaun Tomaszewski on 11/07/2008 @ 07:24AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Shaun -- Once the Obama/Biden Administration is officially in office in 2009, I feel optimistic that progress on improving GLBT civil rights and legal protections will be made. Passing a truly protective Matthew Shepherd Act, along with complete repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act need to be early issues addressed by the new Congress. Correct me if my information is faulty, however, my impression is that it is the Defense of Marriage Act that is empowering states to ban gay marriage.
On the issue of gay marriage, there is one thing I am curious about. Would progress come more easily if the debate field is levelled by defining a union between any two consenting adults performed by an ordained member of a church's clergy in a religious ceremony as a marriage and a similar union presided over by a duly authorized civil official as a civil union? That way, the only issue to be looked at is whether the participants are entering into it voluntarily and of their own free will. I am interested in feedback from others on this idea.
Posted by Sarahmarie Harwood on 11/30/2008 @ 07:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We did have hope in November -- Oh well -- Hope is dying.
Posted by Marlin Bynum on 06/16/2009 @ 12:20PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Another good one to add might be about immigration rights for binational couples. Currently 19 countries (including countries that do not allow same sex marriage or civil unions) do allow same sex permanent partners some immigration rights. This includes countries like South Africa, and I believe that Brazil just passed a similar law. The United States, of course, does not.
Posted by ken thompson on 12/02/2008 @ 08:06PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
im currently living in california and when i heard proposition 8 passed i was immediatly angered also to know that most of my family voted yes on 8 and dont care that it is taking away rights of people who are the same but only diffrent in who they love. i hope that because it is 2009 the Unites States especially California relizes the error of the ways and doesnt let a proposition like 8 in CA or 2 in FL or 102 in (i want to say Arizona?) happen again
Posted by andy sun on 01/05/2009 @ 01:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.