LGBT Health Care
-

Sen. Tom Coburn is Not a Legitimate Voice for a Gay Publication
-

Can Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein Prevent AIDS?
-

It's Time to End the Federal Ban on Gay Blood Donations
Blogging Positively: A Citizen Media 101 on HIV/AIDS
Published August 27, 2009 @ 03:09PM PT

What do you get when you combine a network of bloggers seeking to address the HIV/AIDS pandemic in a meaningful way online? The answer is Blogging Positively, a collection of case studies, interviews, and tips about citizen media related to HIV/AIDS.
Blogging Positively links together over 200 different bloggers from around the world - from India to Argentina to Burma, the United States, Australia and Canada - blogging about the HIV/AIDS pandemic, and the role that online writers and netroots activists can play in mobilizing around public health efforts to combat the disease.
Brian Finch from Canada's "Acid Reflux" blog/blog reality show sums up the significance of Blogging Positively pretty concisely.
"The Internet facilitates technological activism. It gives control and voice to the individual, to express onself in the way he or she deems fit. It is taking back power, creating a voice that is not defined by others. Personally, it is a way to define myself outside of the small box of HIV, to exist outside of the disease paradigm," writes Finch. "The more people are writing openly about their status, the more other people will see that they too can take risks. An online, 'open' presence serves as a role model for others."
Blogging Positively is a role model. It's a unique capacity building resource that draws together blogs, podcasts, and online photo and video sites to create new powerful opportunities for activists aiming to spread awareness about HIV/AIDS, and end the social stigma all too often associated with the disease.
Catholic Church Gives Millions to Fight Gay Marriage. Why Won't They Give Money for Health Care?
Published August 24, 2009 @ 05:49AM PT

The Catholic Church gave more than $500,000 to help enact a same-sex marriage ban in Michigan. The Catholic Church gave $200,000 directly (and up to $1 million more through networks like the Knights of Columbus) to efforts to take away marriage equality in California, by supporting Proposition 8 like gangbusters. This year, the Catholic Church is expected to give up to $2 million (they've already donated more than $100,000 to date) to take away marriage equality in Maine, spending yet more money to take away civil rights for gays and lesbians.
If the Catholic Church can spend all that money on an issue like same-sex marriage, why can't they spend any money or give any institutional pull to help pass national health care, one of the Church's priorities?
Politics certainly seems to be the short answer, given that the institutional bishops have become really close to a political party in this country whose members by and large oppose national health care. Instead of wading into the debate about health care and how health care impacts poverty, education, immigration, and many other supposed priorities of the Church, Catholic bishops and many Catholic organizations have instead spent the past decade focusing on a series of 'non-negotiable' issues that have become increasingly less controversial for the American public: same-sex marriage, euthanasia, and stem cell research. There's also abortion, too, and while that remains a touchy subject in some parts of the U.S., most of the country still believes that women should have the ability to determine their reproductive health.
Makes one wonder if the Catholic Church in this country, while still a source of money for very conservative causes, is watching its political influence dry up. Last week Obama gathered numerous faith groups together to talk about universal health care. There were Jewish organizations, Methodist organizations, Baptist organizations, Muslim organizations, and evangelical organizations in the fold. But no Catholic Bishops.
On paper, the church supports universal health care. On paper, the church supports a public option. On paper, the church says that ending poverty is a fundamental issue of our time.
But in practice, the Church is spending millions of dollars to take away the civil rights of gay and lesbian people in places like Maine, instead of supporting national health care for all. Our country is having the largest conversation about health care in nearly twenty years, but the Church is more concerned about whether Lutherans will accept gay clergy.
Misplaced priorities? Well, if the sky is blue....
Activism, Art, and the HIV/AIDS Crisis
Published August 20, 2009 @ 05:23PM PT

How do you commemorate the fear, anger, hope, challenges, activism, and organizing that occurred at the height of the HIV/AIDS crisis in the U.S. more than twenty years ago? If you're the Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts, you host a whole semester's worth of programming and exhibits looking at the impact that groups like ACT UP had, and the vivid images that captured the country's attention and changed the way that HIV/AIDS was viewed.
Before there was social networking, there was guerilla marketing. And as the Carpenter Center points out, that tactic was deployed quite effectively by ACT UP, as well as artist collectives like Gran Fury, the Silence = Death Project, and Fierce Pussy (to name a few). These groups used the power of art to fight against HIV/AIDS, and specifically to fight against government inaction and stereotypes that made up the early history of the disease in this country. Whether it was explaining that kissing doesn't cause HIV/AIDS, or whether it was telling the Catholic Church that condoms protect against sexually-transmitted diseases, these orgs put their artwork where their politics were, so to speak.
"ACT UP’s demonstrations in the late 1980s and early 1990s reflected the group’s outrage against a governing establishment that ignored HIV/AIDS as a national health crisis; that failed to secure funding for medical research, treatment, and education; that profited from inflated costs for therapeutic drugs; and that perpetuated homophobic misrepresentations of HIV and AIDS," writes the Carpenter Center.
The exhibit itself? Well, it'll feature classic ACT UP advertising campaign posters, as well as a suite of over 100 video interviews with surviving members of ACT UP New York. Those interviews form the crux of an oral history project that captures a diverse movement birthed during the darkest days of HIV/AIDS. These are the organizers and activists who "transformed entrenched cultural ideas about homosexuality, sexuality, illness, health care, civil rights, art, media, and the rights of patients," and made the world a little - scratch that, a lot - better for everyone fighting against the disease.
In other words, the exhibit at the Carpenter Center will pull together some of the best social artwork of the last thirty years: the artwork and ad campaigns that helped end misinformation about HIV/AIDS, that brought about new strategies of political organizing, and that helped give voice to those living with HIV/AIDS. Better yet, it should help draw the connections between the organizing and activism at the height of the 1980s, and how lessons learned during that movement can be applicable now.
The Malaysian Government Thinks that Homosexuality Causes Swine Flu
Published August 09, 2009 @ 06:05AM PT

Every so often there's a story on the global health circuit that is so absurd, it causes our proverbial record to scratch. Like the time that South Africa's former Health Minister, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, said that ingesting lemon juice and potatoes could help treat HIV. Or when evangelical groups like Word Relief, who received millions of U.S. federal dollars in PEPFAR funding under President George W. Bush, told people in countries like Mozambique, Kenya and Haiti that condoms don't work to prevent STDs.
Well, now it's time to count Malaysia's government-run news service as part of the global health lie factory. Today they're out with an article from a physician that says homosexuality and masturbation make the body an easy target for Swine Flu (otherwise known as H1N1). The scary part is that the news service in question, Bernama, runs their stories in nearly every part of the country. Lies and misinformation, get ready to spread.
The doctor at the center of the article, V. M. Palaniappan, used to teach ecology at the University of Malaysia. Maybe he should have stuck with ecology instead of wading into the waters of global health. Here's his rationalization behind his theory, which almost reads like a non-sequitor from Alaska's former governor. Check it out:
Dr. V. M. Palaniappan said that homosexuality and masturbation caused the body to develop friction heat which in turn, produced acid and made the body hyperacidised.
"Thus, the body becomes an easy target for H1N1 infection," he told Bernama, emphasising however, that normal sexual union between members of the opposite sex was absolutely safe....
Ah, yes. It's only the homosexual sex that causes friction heat. Must be all that dance music we listen to while getting it on...
Two words come to mind. Medical crackpot. Yet the government of Malaysia gives this guy a voice with which to reach people across the country, and offer medical advice. I wonder if that has anything to do with the fact that Malaysia criminalizes homosexuality with penalties ranging from twenty years in prison to whippings and beatings. Or that Malaysia's ruling political party is so vehemently anti-LGBT, that they even have a sub-section of the party known as the "People's Anti-Homosexual Voluntary Movement."
Anyone else thinking that we could start a reality show under the title of, "When Countries Attack Global Health"?
The Ad Campaign that Says AIDS is Washington, D.C.'s "Katrina"
Published August 04, 2009 @ 12:31PM PT
The D.C.-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation is taking the staggering statistics about Washington, D.C.'s HIV/AIDS rate, and turning them into an ad campaign that shows how devastating the disease is inside the Beltway. The ad campaign, "AIDS is D.C.'s Katrina," is up and running on dozens of bus shelters throughout the D.C. area, and depicts an image of former President George W. Bush surveying the damage from Hurricane Katrina from the windows of Air Force One. In the foreground, however, a cardboard sign vividly says, "AIDS is D.C.'s Katrina."
Powerful stuff. Especially given the statistics that lie behind the ad. The HIV/AIDS rate in Washington, D.C. is higher than several African countries, at nearly 3% of the total population, and clinics in D.C. have seen a 232% increase in the number of cases they're diagnosing. Those types of statistics certainly deserve and merit a vivid public advertising campaign.
Here's what Michael Weinstein, the head of the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, had to say about the campaign:
Katrina quickly came to symbolize the Bush administration's neglect and indifference of some of America's most vulnerable citizens. Today, 56,000 new HIV infections each year in the United States, a 40% increase from last year, symbolizing neglect and indifference -- and the failure of our U.S. HIV prevention efforts.
The fact that Washington, D.C.'s HIV prevalence rate is now higher than some hard-hit African countries is an indictment of how the CDC has failed to lead in HIV prevention efforts. When this news about Washington's HIV rate first broke in March, President Obama remained silent. Despite his silence on AIDS to date, we hope this ad will prod President Obama to act forcefully on AIDS, and we remain hopeful he will be the change that we can believe in -- and urgently need -- on AIDS.
Prodding Obama to change domestic policies related to HIV/AIDS care is also the vision behind a related Web site, changeaidsobama.org, which seeks to use the images in the advertising campaign to pressure the Obama administration into adopting serious policy reforms to address high rates of HIV/AIDS, including overturning a ban on federal funding for needle exchange programs (a pledge Obama made during his Presidential campaign, but one that he's backed off of since taking office).
Click here to view an ad for changeaidsobama.org. Check out their message, and if you agree, check out their action section and send a letter to President Obama asking him to be the "change we can believe in" on HIV/AIDS.
The decimation and destruction of Hurricane Katrina is still being felt four years later. For those suffering from HIV/AIDS, it's been 28 years. In both instances, government response was slow, inadequate, and disastrous.
Is Tobacco the Number One Cause of Death Among Gays and Lesbians?
Published July 25, 2009 @ 04:35PM PT

Rumors have been there for a while now that smoking rates among LGBT people were phenomenally higher than smoking rates among straight people. There's now evidence to back this theory up.
A study coming out in the August 2009 issue of Tobacco Control shows that gay men and lesbians are radically more apt to light up a cigarette than heterosexual men and women. The folks behind the study are researchers with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and they have one conclusive sentence to sum up their work: "Smoking is a significant health inequality for sexual minorities."
Here are some bullet points about their study:
- Upwards of 37 percent of lesbian women in the United States smoke cigarettes, which compares to only 18 percent of straight women;
- For gay men it's upwards of 33 percent, whereas approximately only 24 percent of straight men light up; and
- Researchers used more than 20 years of studies and research on the issue of LGBT smoking to inform their findings
Higher smoking rates for gay men and lesbians could be having a disastrous impact on public health for LGBT Americans. Joseph Lee, one of the lead researchers of the report, had this to say:
Likely explanations include the success of tobacco industry’s targeted marketing to gays and lesbians, as well as time spent in smoky social venues and stress from discrimination.
These aren't new phenomena. Groups like the National LGBT Tobacco Control Network have formed to try and put a dent in the rates of smoking among LGBT populations, and to point out concerning marketing techniques to get queer people - especially younger LGBT people - to smoke. Groups like these are important to curbing high rates of smoking. Because as well all know, prolonged smoking causes a torrent of diseases, and that torrent of diseases often results in death.
That's not a fact lost on the researchers. Here's Lee again:
Tobacco is likely the number one cause of death among gays and lesbians.
The American Cancer Society estimates that at least 30,000 LGBT people die each year from smoking-related illnesses. And that's a conservative estimate.
Much more information on the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill study can be found online at Tobacco Journal's Web site. While the results can be a little upsetting to read, they're meant to help inform folks about the health consequences unique to LGBT folks from smoking. And while studies like this are grim, they do help in spreading a culture of public health in LGBT circles.
Homophobia Spreads HIV/AIDS in Africa
Published July 21, 2009 @ 07:00AM PT

HIV/AIDS in Africa has many faces. One of them that's not terribly well reported - but still nonetheless shocking - is the face of HIV/AIDS in gay male populations. This week, a study in the Lancet sheds light on just how devastating this disease is on gay men throughout the continent. The results, above all else, show the dire effects that homophobia can have in spreading HIV/AIDS.
First, the numbers. Gay men in many African countries are more than 10 times more likely to contract HIV/AIDS than their straight counterparts.
Next, the analysis. Here are just a few of the reasons why researchers believe gay men in Africa are much more likely to contract HIV/AIDS than straight men:
- Prejudice toward gay people leads to isolation and harassment, which results in many gay men engaging in risky, underground sexual practices;
- Within sub-Saharan Africa, HIV/AIDS in gay men is driven by cultural, religious and political unwillingness to accept LGBT people as equal members of society;
- A lack of education: one activist in Burundi told the BBC News that men understand that you can get HIV/AIDS from having sex with a woman, but not from a man. Failing to educate properly about the transmission of HIV/AIDS leads to higher contraction rates; and
- HIV/AIDS rates among gay men are often under-reported by public health officials, leading to very little attention being given to the epidemic among Africa's queer population.
The evidence here is stark: homophobia balloons HIV/AIDS rates. In Sub-Saharan Africa, more than 30 countries criminalize homosexuality, with a few (including Niger and Sudan) that prosecute homosexuality as an offense worthy of the death penalty. In a climate like this, it's no wonder that it's hard to do HIV/AIDS education work among gay male populations. As Time Magazine writes, "...one reason it has been so difficult to reach gay men with AIDS-prevention messages: most of them don't want to be found."
Finally, the solutions. The researchers who conducted the study, including folks with Oxford University, the Population Council of Ghana, and the Kenya Medical Research Institute, all recognized several steps that should be taken in order to curb HIV/AIDS rates among gay men throughout Africa. Among the ideas?
- Delivering basic HIV/AIDS prevention supplies to at-risk populations, including dispersing condoms;
- Train HIV/AIDS workers in how to work with queer populations; and
- Destigmatize and decriminalize homosexuality.
That last one is certainly going to take some work. But the results of this study, again, can't illuminate the problem any brighter: criminalizing homosexuality, and driving large numbers of queer people underground, only incresaes HIV/AIDS. That's a problem that we can't afford to keep perpetuating any longer.
















